Archive for March 7th, 2013

All local, all the time.

Thursday, March 7th, 2013

A Round Rock police officer shot himself in the right foot Tuesday. I’ve avoided blogging this until now because the Statesman didn’t have much detail beyond that. But this is interesting:

A Round Rock police officer who accidentally discharged a gun into his right foot Tuesday was attending a workshop to become an instructor for Glock firearms, said Dee Carver, a police spokeswoman.

Also, it gives me an excuse to embed this video, which never gets old:

And the case of the dog with no nose? The ownership question has been resolved:

The dog, a bearded collie that rescuers named “Victory” will remain in the care of Austin Pets Alive which will place it in a foster home.

The Statesman does not report a judicial ruling on the question of “how does it smell?”.

(Previous coverage.)

Old Man Yells At Cloud.

Thursday, March 7th, 2013

This has come up in conversation twice in the past seven days. I believe that is a sign that I have to make a blog post out of it.

Django Unchained” is currently number 41 on the IMDB list of top 250 movies.

Here are some movies that the IMDB top 250 voters think “Django Unchained” is better than:

  • “Citizen Kane” (#46)
  • “Lawrence of Arabia” (#69)
  • “Return of the Jedi” (#80)
  • “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” (#86)
  • “Heat” (#120)
  • “The Maltese Falcon” (#122)
  • “Fargo” (#129)
  • “The Wizard of Oz” (#151)
  • “Network” (#169)
  • “The Exorcist” (#204)

Feel free to go through the list and post your own “Django Unchained is better than…WTF?” moments in the comments. I, personally, promise not to refer to you as Grandpa Simpson, though I can’t say the same for other people.

Is it just me?

Thursday, March 7th, 2013

…or are there other folks out there who see the Pocket Hose commercial and say to themselves “Ph’nglui mglw’nafh Cthulhu R’lyeh wgah’nagl fhtagn“? (I can’t get the video to start where I want it to, even with YouTube’s embed link, so fast-forward to about 56 seconds in to see what I’m talking about.)

(And how have I gotten by for this long without a “Cthulhu” tag? Fixed now.)

Right turn, Clyde.

Thursday, March 7th, 2013

One of FARK’s ongoing tropes is the idea that NASCAR is the sport of white male rednecks. So the story of Tia Norfleet should push some buttons: she’s not just a woman, but she’s the first African-Amercian woman to race in NASCAR, or so she says on her website.

In speaking engagements with students and in news media interviews, Norfleet has for several years portrayed herself as an accomplished driver in the sport. She has sought sponsorships and has a PayPal account on her Web site, which includes articles and videos about her achievements.

Her website also says that she plans to run a “full schedule” in the NASCAR Nationwide series, “one rung below the top-tier Sprint Cup series”. At least, that’s what the NYT says: I can’t find this claim on her actual website. She does have a schedule, but the schedule appears to be just a list of NASCAR races this year, with links going back to the race pages on NASCAR.com. She does not appear in the results for the Dollar General 200, or the DRIVE4COPD 300. I am unable to find any mention of Tia Norfleet on the NASCAR Nationwide drivers page.

You see where this is going, don’t you?

But Norfleet is not licensed to compete at that level [the Nationwide series level – DB]. In fact, the only sanctioned race that Norfleet has entered, according to the sport’s officials, was a low-level event last year at the Motor Mile Speedway in Radford, Va., where she completed one lap before driving onto pit road and parking her racecar.

More:

For the past four years, Norfleet has purchased a license to race at the lowest level of stock-car racing. There is no vetting process for such a license; individual racetracks must approve drivers for competition.
To move up to a higher level of competition — a regional touring series like the K&N Pro Series East or the K&N Pro Series West — a driver must earn approval from Nascar. Norfleet has not done that yet.

And more:

Norfleet had indicated that she planned to race in an Arca event at Daytona International Speedway last month. But she had not completed an application to race for Arca; had not bought an Arca license; and had not participated in a test at Daytona in December, which was required to race there.

In addition, Ms. Norfleet may have a bit of a criminal record for assault and “crossing a guard line at a jail with contraband and possession of marijuana“. That’s not necessarily a disqualifying factor, in my humble opinion: I’d certainly be willing to give someone a shot at redemption in NASCAR with that kind of record. But when you put that together with the other pieces, it raises alarm bells.

Noted without comment:

…publications and Web sites like The Washington Post, The Huffington Post and ESPN have heralded her ascent.

Edited to add: Ms. Norfleet has posted an Instagram photo purporting to prove she does have a license. I am not a NASCAR expert, but there are three things I wonder about:

  1. Is there anyone out there who has seen an actual NASCAR license and can vouch for the fact that the photo looks correct? There’s no driver picture on it. I’ve never seen a NASCAR license and Google Image Search isn’t helpful.
  2. If I am reading it right, the license is for the “Whelen All-American” series, which I am not familiar with, but which looks (from NASCAR’s website) to be a step or two down from the K&N Pro Series (which, in turn, is below the Nationwide series). I wonder if this is one of those series where you can purchase a license from an individual racetrack.
  3. Ms. Norfleet does not show up in the top 500 drivers in that series through last September.

The Spiders from Cleveland.

Thursday, March 7th, 2013

By way of Borepatch, I found this rather amusing post on the 1899 Cleveland Spiders.

For those who don’t follow baseball history (or loser history) the Spiders were a major league baseball team. But you would have been hard pressed to tell in 1899: the team went 20-134, the worst record ever in baseball history. (That’s a .130 winning percentage.)

They finished 84 games out of first place. They lost 40 of their last 41 games.

(I would actually kind of like one of the hats, but I’m not sure it is a $49 hat. And the J. Thomas Hetrick book MISFITS! Baseball’s Worst Ever Team is not just available from Amazon, but actually has a Kindle edition.)