You’ll never guess who is suing the producers of “Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark”.
No, really. Go ahead, try to guess.
Did you guess Julie Taymor? Very good. Take two gold stars and advance to the next blue square.
You’ll never guess who is suing the producers of “Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark”.
No, really. Go ahead, try to guess.
Did you guess Julie Taymor? Very good. Take two gold stars and advance to the next blue square.
Did you read that? They lost body parts.
(ETA: WP coverage.)
But hey! They manage to account for 99.5% of the body parts! Shouldn’t we give them a pass? After all, it isn’t like they work for Penn State…
I haven’t had much to say about the story because….well, I haven’t had much to say about the story. I’ve always had a certain fondness for Penn State (my dad went there for a couple of years, and Penn State was his college football team, to the extent that he followed sports), but what can you say about this?
For once, I’m going to point to a FARK thread, which actually contains some good information and links (in addition to the usual FARK Internet Tough Guy BS).
And remember our friendly Orleans Parish prosecutor’s office? They got their butts handed to them by the Supreme Court in oral arguments.
Here is a partial list of movies that Gregg Easterbrook apparently thinks are better than “The Dark Knight”:
After the jump, we’ll dig a little deeper into Easterbrook as film critic in this week’s TMQ…
Read the rest of this entry »
Except apparently there is.
Also worth noting: Thompson’s defense attorney has asked for a new trial, alleging that some of the jurors may have seen press coverage that they shouldn’t have been exposed to. The more coverage I see of these allegations by Thompson’s defense attorney, the less substance I see in them; the allegations are detailed in the linked article for anyone who’s interested.
Obit watch: Smokin’ Joe Frazier, 32-4-1. (And two of those losses were to Ali.) NYT obit.
Christo has obtained Federal approval for his latest project, “Over the River”.
(Artists conception in the linked article.)
Yeah. At least, it must never happen again until the next time the NYT and the current administration want to drum up support for a ban on modern sporting rifles.
If you dine out, in a sit-down restaurant, where someone actually brings food to your table, you should leave a reasonable tip.
I’m generally on the side of 15% as a base, though what I do in practice is double the sales tax. (Local sales tax around Austin is generally 8.25%, so that’s actually 16.5%.) I will tip 20% or 25% if I have a good reason to. I’m not as bothered by an 18% mandatory gratuity on large parties as I used to be; if the definition of a large party meets mine (five people is not large; seven+ is) and if they go above and beyond in some way (splitting the ticket six or seven ways for a party of seven, to me, justifies at least 18%).
In any case, I strongly recommend against a 200%+ tip, especially if you’re on an expense account.
Because if you’re on an expense account and turn in a receipt that shows you tipped the waitress at Hooter’s $24.52 for a mushroom cheeseburger that cost $7.48, somebody in the accounting department is going to ask questions. And eventually they’re going to find out that you tipped the waitress $24.52 to cover your bar tab, since your city expense account doesn’t cover alcohol.
(The heck of it is, I think the city policy is unreasonable. It doesn’t bother me that much for a couple of off-duty cops dining out of town to have a beer or two with their meals, and have the city pay for it. As long as they don’t get messed up and embarrass the city, say, by having the waitress pose with their patrol rifle, I don’t get hot and bothered by adults having a beer. But if they knew city policy was otherwise, and they lied about it because they were too cheap to pay their own bar tab, yeah, fire their butts.)
(If you’re not on an expense account, the above doesn’t apply to you. Feel free to tip the waitress 200%. Or 300%. Or 500%. But keep in mind; she’s not going to sleep with you, no matter how much you tip her.)
Previously on “As The Grand Jury Turns”, two prosecutors and two court reporters were summoned before a judge to answer contempt of court charges. Specifically, the two prosecutors are accused of obtaining transcripts of confidential proceedings from a grand jury that is investigating the DA’s office; the court reporters are (as far as we can tell) accused of being the ones who gave the prosecutors the transcripts.
Anyway, the hearing was today, and…the judge in the contempt case ended up having to recuse herself, as she may be called as a witness in the contempt case as well.
Chalk up another point for The Hon. Murray Newman.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court takes up the case of United States vs. Jones. The key issue in Jones is: did the use of a vehicle-mounted GPS device, without a warrant, to track the movements of a suspected drug dealer, violate the 4th Amendment?
This may very well be one of the most significant 4th Amendment cases in years. The Ninth Circuit has already ruled, in a different case, that the subject
The LAT has an overview of the case, and the issues involved. We’re pretty biased in favor of Jones, and in favor of our hero Judge Alex “Big Al” Kozinski, who wrote:
There is nothing about GPS tracking that rises to the level of “exigent circumstances” that would justify giving law enforcement a pass on the requirement for a search warrant. We hope that the Supreme Court feels the same way.
(Bonus points to Carol J. Williams for opening with the story of Katz vs. United States, which we have covered previously in this space.)
Or, what do you do with an apparently abandoned hospital that you can’t unload?
Today’s Statesman has an article about the hospital situation in Lakeway. (For those unfamiliar with Austin geography, Lakeway is a rapidly growing part of the greater Austin area, located west of Austin proper, out near Lake Travis.) I happen to be interested in this story for reasons I’m not sure I can talk about, but there’s some things in it that are worth blogging about.
Basically, there were plans for two hospitals. One is the Lakeway Regional Medical Center, which is going to be a pretty large complex (complete with labor and delivery facilities). The other was Lake Travis Transitional Medical Center, a smaller (46 beds) facility that started out as a “transitional facility”: “the hospital would be aimed at patients who were recovering from a traumatic injury or had some other serious medical problem and needed to be hospitalized 25 or more days.” At some point, though, plans changed and Lake Travis Transitional became a direct competitor of Lakeway Regional.
Another twist:
Lake Travis Transitional asked HUD for information about the loan, but HUD wasn’t forthcoming. LTT sued HUD:
Nobody with Lake Travis seems to want to talk to the Statesman these days.
My personal opinion is that this is slightly misleading. The distances the Statesman gives are accurate, but to get to Seton Southwest you have to travel Texas 71; traffic frequently backs up, especially in Oak Hill, and there have been a lot of serious (fatal) accidents on that stretch of road. The Hospital at Westlake is, I think, a little better to get to. Bee Cave Road isn’t as bad as 71. But The Hospital at Westlake strikes me as being more of a boutique hospital than a general practice one. It seems like the kind of place that people go to for plastic surgery, not where you’d go when your left ventricle seizes up.
I previously noted the story of Stephen Kinzey, professor at Cal State San Bernardino, accused member of a biker gang and meth dealer.
Today’s LAT provides us with a longer background piece on Professor Kinzey and the charges against him. Interesting note:
Also amusing:
Yeah, honey. Meth’s a heck of a drug.
NFL teams that still have a chance to go 0-16:
Indianapolis
I wish I could explain why the Otto Zehm story makes me so angry. After all, The Agitator is on my blog roll; surely I get my fill of police abuse stories from there? Why is this one different from all the other ones?
I don’t know. Maybe what makes me so angry isn’t just that a police officer beat a defenseless unarmed man to death and tried to lie about it, but that his superiors – from the chief of police and the mayor on down – tried to cover for him, and are still in denial that he actually did anything wrong.
But surely there are other things going on in Spokane, Washington, right?
Yes. Yes, there are.
The gentleman in question, Detective Jay Mehring, was arrested in March of 2007 on charges that he’d threatened to kill his wife (apparently, they were divorcing, and the split was not friendly). At that time, he was placed in “unpaid layoff” status. That’s fair, right? You don’t want someone facing criminal charges working as a police officer.
Detective Mehring went to trial in October of 2008, and was acquitted of the charge. The Spokane city attorney recommended at that time that Detective Mehring be reinstated and given back pay.
Here’s an additional tidbit for you:
But here’s what really set me off:
Marlene Feist, spokeswoman for the City of Spokane, said the verdict likely will be appealed.
High standards? High standards?! Let me remind you what Chief Kirkpatrick said:
And this was after the release of the security video that contradicted Thompson’s story. Chief Kirkpatrick knew Thompson was a liar, and knew the Feds were investigating. But she continued to support Thompson, because beating an unarmed man to death apparently doesn’t violate her “high standards”.
We’ve mentioned Laura Hall, the Happy Hacker, before.
Seems as if she was up for parole again…and got turned down again.
Time sure flies, doesn’t it? Except maybe if you’re spending time in prison for helping your boyfriend cut up a body. I bet it just creeps along in that case.
Officer Karl F. Thompson Jr. of the Spokane, Washington police department was convicted in Federal court yesterday of civil rights violations and obstruction of justice.
What did Officer Thompson do? He confronted a man named Otto Zehm in a convenience store. I apologize for the length of this excerpt, but I want to give you a full picture.
Let me repeat that. Thompson hit Zehm twice in the head, knocked him to the ground, tased him while he was down and in a fetal position, and then hit him seven times in eight seconds while he was down and in a fetal position.
But wait! It gets better!
Here’s a timeline of events from the Spokane Spokesman-Review. Reading over it:
And Thompson had the support of the mayor and police chief (not Jim Nicks: just wait):
On the other hand,
It sure looks to me like Thompson and company beat a man to death for no reason, and then the Spokane PD and city of Spokane tried as hard as they could to cover it up; it took the Feds becoming involved for the whole dirty story to come to light.
The prosecution is apparently asking for six to eight years in prison for Officer Thompson, who is 64 years old. Otto Zehm was 36 years old when the Spokane PD murdered him.