Whipped Cream Difficulties

That evil Robert “Ratso” Rizzo! He tied people up…and made them take money! The horror! The horror!

You think I’m kidding, right?

George Cole, a former steelworker, returned to the witness stand for a second day and testified that he voted for a 12% annual pay raise for a City Council board in 2008 only because he feared retribution from then-City Manager Robert Rizzo.

More:

“He had shown himself to be very vindictive if you crossed him at that time,” Cole said. “I was worried that if I didn’t vote for this, if I voted against it, he would do whatever he could to destroy the work that was important to me and the community. I knew that was his character.”
Cole said it was the most difficult decision he ever made while on the council but was in the best interest of Bell — a city, he said, where he had devoted decades to advocating for new schools and programs for at-risk youths and senior citizens.

…

The 63-year-old also told jurors that when he discovered $15,500 had been deposited into a 401(k)-style account for him, he complained. Cole said Rizzo refused to remove the money.

Cole is quoted, in a separate LANow blog post, as wanting to give up his salary in 2007, after one of Bell’s parks was closed. Ratso was not pleased:

“He got angry and told me if I didn’t take the salary I would have to resign from the City Council,” Cole said. “I told him that I was elected to that position by the people of the community, and if I didn’t want to take the salary and stay on board that was entirely up to me,” Cole said.

My understanding of city manager/council government is that the council tells the manager what to do, not the other way around. The testimony seems to be that Rizzo was driving the train. Left unanswered so far: why did the council allow this? If, indeed, the council did, and people like Cole aren’t engaging in retroactive butt covering?

Former San Diego Mayor Maureen O’Connor acknowledged in federal court Thursday that she gambled away millions of dollars that her late husband had earmarked for charity purposes.

Ms. O’Connor is getting a “deferred prosecution” deal.

Under a bargain with prosecutors, O’Connor agreed to make $2 million in restitution; if she violates no further laws in the next two years, the charge may be dismissed.

What happened? O’Connor’s husband was Robert Peterson, founder of Jack in the Box who “made a fortune in the restaurant, hotel and banking industries”. So she had money. LOTS of money.

O’Connor is destitute after gambling away $1 billion at casinos in the San Diego area and Las Vegas and Atlantic City from 2000 to 2009, according to prosecutors. She has admitted having a gambling addiction, prosecutors said.

Yeah, you read that right. She gambled away One. Billion. Dollars. That’s $100 million a year, or $8.3 million a month.

Anyway, when she ran out of money, she took money from the charitable foundation her husband started, which is now defunct because she stole the money.

O’Connor, who underwent surgery to remove a brain tumor in 2011, used a cane and needed help walking as she entered the courtroom of federal Judge David Bartick. In her youth, she had been a star swimmer and later a physical education teacher before being elected to the City Council in 1971 as a maverick Democrat.

So other than the question of exactly how you gamble away $100 million a year, and how you do that for ten years without realizing you have a problem: how exactly is a destitute 66-year-old woman who needs help walking supposed to pay back $2 million? (The late Mr. Peterson’s Wikipedia entry says he had four kids from a previous marriage, but apparently none with O’Connor.)

I was out of pocket for much of the day Tuesday, which is why I didn’t update. Oddly, there seems to be a gap in the trial coverage on the LAT site: if anything did happen Tuesday, the paper didn’t report it.

As far as yesterday’s testimony: indicted former councilman George Mirabal was back on the stand.

“Did you specifically ask Mr. Lee, ‘Can I get this salary?’”
“No.”
“Why not?”
“Because he was in charge of maintaining surveillance on all these type of actions,” Mirabal said. “His firm was getting like $13,000 a month, the least he can do is look at all the resolutions and various ordinances.”

(Mr. Lee is Ed Lee, who was Bell’s city attorney.)

Also on the stand: Annette Peretz, Bell’s former director of community services. Her salary was $273,000 a year when she retired in 2010.

Attorneys have a saying: “Never ask a witness a question that you don’t know the answer to.” In that light, this exchange is…interesting.

The court received a jolt, though, when Deputy Dist. Atty. Edward Miller opened his cross-examination by asking: “Were you Robert Rizzo’s girlfriend?”

The judge ruled that Peretz did not have to answer that question, and Peretz also declined comment to reporters.

I can’t find a photo of Peretz, but as a reminder, this is Robert “Ratso” Rizzo:

Peretz also testified as, basically, a character witness for indicted council member Teresa Jacobo, saying “she often saw Jacobo meeting with residents at the community center and visiting senior housing facilities.”

Peretz, who took a $95,000 city loan from a program Rizzo developed, filed a lawsuit against Bell for retirement and medical benefits. A judge ruled for the city earlier this month. Rizzo is charged with illegally loaning out city money.

Also testifying as witnesses for Jacobo: two of her daughters, and “a woman who lives in one of Bell’s mobile home parks”:

Candalaria Ramirez said Jacobo was a trusted, frequent visitor who responded to residents and was instrumental in firing the management company that residents had complained was mistreating seniors and had racist employees.

“We expect behavior like this in Castro’s Cuba or the city of Bell, not in Newport Beach,” Stop the Dock Tax Chairman Bob McCaffrey said in a prepared statement.

You know, when your city is being compared unfavorably to a fifth-world dictatorship, maybe it is time to shut everything down and start over from scratch.

Teresa Jacobo wrapped up her testimony yesterday in the Bell trial, and indicted former council member George Mirabal is testifying now.

Mirabel is pretty much echoing Jacobo: I didn’t know I was doing anything wrong, I thought it was okay because the city attorney said so, and I did a lot of work outside of meetings for the city.

Deputy Dist. Atty. Edward Miller questioned Mirabal about the day shortly after his 2010 arrest that he voluntarily told prosecutors that no work was done on authorities outside of meetings.
Mirabal said that if he had made such a statement, it was incorrect. He said he couldn’t remember what was said back then and “might have heed and hawed.”
“So it’s easy to remember now?” Miller asked.
“Yes, actually.”
“More than two years after charges have been filed, it’s easier for you to remember now that you did work outside of the meetings for the Public Finance Authority?”
“Yes, sir.”