Archive for May, 2010

I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of aspiring actors cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

Friday, May 14th, 2010

Obit watch: “Law and Order”: Original Recipe, aka “The Full Employment for Aspiring Actors and Actresses In New York City Program”.

By one estimate, more than 8,000 people in the city are employed, directly and indirectly, by the series and its two spinoffs. The franchise has been especially important to the many Broadway and Off Broadway actors who make appearances on the shows.

I’ve watched various incarnations of the series and spinoffs, but I could never get into the original after Michael Moriarty left; Sam Waterston, to me, has all the charisma of a bowl of oatmeal. I’d still tune in from time to time and watch the first half just to see the late Jerry Orbach work, but after he died, so did my last tie to the show.

Still, the show deserves some kind of tribute, and this gives me an excuse to present some of my favorite L&O related art.

Brandon Bird’s painting, “A Night Away” (hotlinked):

Brandon Bird's "Night Away".

(Larger, better quality version.) Supposedly, this was a private commission; if Bird would make prints available, I’d snap one up. In the meantime, here’s a link to Bird’s “Law & Order: Artistic Intent” and some related L&O art. I’m also kind of fond of “Lennie Grabs a Dog” and “A Tough Day at the Office“.

Stolen from FARK threads:

And the single biggest “WTF?” moment in the history of “Law and Order”:

Edited to add: Now that I’m back home and not behind a filter, here’s Sam Waterston at his best:

Götterdämmerung.

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

I’ve been following the L.A. Opera’s staging of the Ring Cycle, and the associated “Ring Festival L.A.”, avidly. I’m excited by the idea of someone other than the usual suspects doing complete stagings of the operas, and I love the various events that have been arranged to go along with the staging.

But I wasn’t expecting Siegfried and Brunnhilde to openly revolt.

In separate interviews, British tenor John Treleaven, who plays the hero Siegfried, and American soprano Linda Watson, who plays Brunnhilde, said German director Achim Freyer’s avant-garde staging — which features a steeply tilted stage, bulky costumes and oversized masks — interferes with their acting and singing and poses excruciating physical burdens.

Watson called the set “the most dangerous stage I’ve been on in my entire career.…Your whole neck is tipped wrong. It’s very painful to do it for hours.”

As the LAT notes, this kind of public criticism during a production is rare. I’ve never heard of any performer claiming that a staging is actually physically dangerous, as Watson and Treleaven are. This makes me wish I had money and time to fly out to L.A.

Watson currently is the reigning Brunnhilde at the Bayreuth Festival

That must be a fun fact to drop at parties. “What do you do for a living, dear?” “Oh, I’m the reigning Brunnhilde at Bayreuth.”

Obit watch.

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Little Orphan Annie.

Leadership secrets of Non-Fictional characters (Part 3 of a series.)

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

One piece of writing that changed the way I thought is Seth Godin’s “Why Are We Willing To Tolerate Bullies?” essay in Fast Company issue number 41. If you have not read that essay, I commend it to your attention.

That essay is the first thing I thought of when I read this entry in the “Diner’s Journal” blog at the NYT: “Why I Got Kicked Out of a Restaurant on Saturday Night” by Ron Lieber. The short version: Mr. Lieber and his party sat down to dine, and were treated to the chef loudly berating one of his staff members. After this went on for a while, Mr. Lieber went into the kitchen and informed the chef that he was disrupting the dining experience, as well as being a bully, and asked the chef to stop. The chef responded by asking Mr. Lieber and his party to leave.

My reaction is that Mr. Lieber did the right and noble thing; he stood up to a bully. I would expect people to be backing him up. Instead, many of the comments at the NYT site seem to take the chef’s side, talking about the kitchen being “sacred” space, or making Gordon Ramsey comparisons.

The kitchen is sacred space, and Mr. Lieber shouldn’t have entered? No, not when I’m paying for the dining experience, and you’re disrupting it. Once what goes on in your “sacred space” overlaps into my space, you’ve lost any right you have to privacy.

Yes, kitchens are rough places to work, as Anthony Bourdain will tell you. But he’s also made it clear that there’s a difference between normal kitchen behavior, where people blow up at each other and get over it in a few minutes, and this kind of pathological yelling at staff.

Gordon Ramsey does it? Maybe he does; all most of us have seen is his TV persona, and I’ve seen damn little of that. I’ll tell you something else about Gordon Ramsey, though. Bourdain tells a story about what happened when Ramsey quit one of the restaurants he was working in; the entire staff quit. Not just the back-of-the-house kitchen staff who were closest to Ramsey, but the entire front of the house staff as well. Can you inspire that kind of loyalty in your staff? Then maybe you can get away with yelling at them like Ramsey.

When we tolerate bullying behavior, even if it’s just putting up with a chef yelling in a restaurant, we’re moving down a slippery slope. One day, it’s just someone yelling at his staff. But tolerate that long enough, and eventually you’re tolerating prosecutors and judges trying to railroad innocent defendants. At some point, we need to draw a line and stand up to the bullies. And we need to backstop each other when we do.

Well done, Mr. Lieber. Shame on you, Marc Forgione.

(Hattip: Mom for the NYT article. Popehat has the best short summary I’ve found of the Tonya Craft trial, with plenty of links to other coverage. Reason’s “Hit and Run” blog has been on the case as well.)

Quote of the day.

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

“It is actually very difficult to overdose on Vitamin D, but two million IU a day is a good start.”

By way of Lowering the Bar.

Edited to add: Quote of the day #2.

“Right off the bat you know this is not your usual capital case in that the defendant’s middle name is neither ‘Wayne’ nor ‘Dale,’ which standing alone is probably enough to support a claim of actual innocence.”

(Via The Volokh Conspiracy.)

Hackwork.

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

I’ve been a big fan of Tom Shales since I started reading the WP online. Only a small handful of people – Roger Ebert, Shales, and possibly a few others – can do a negative review well.

But this review of the PBS series “Need to Know” is lousy hackwork.

  1. Starting off with a riff on A Tale of Two Cities is a cliche you’d expect from a lousy writer such as myself, not a Pulitzer-prize winning media critic.
  2. Shales spends three and a half paragraphs ranting about…computer viruses? before getting into the actual subject of his review.
  3. His main point seems to be that computers and the “digital revolution” are responsible for displacing Bill Moyers. I won’t get into my personal feelings about Moyers, and I never watched his show. But Shales seems to be basing much of his dislike for the show on his idea that Moyers was forced out.
    I realize that this is a popular conspiracy theory, but it isn’t true. As PBS Ombudsman Michael Getler has noted, more than once, “Bill Moyers Journal” ended because Bill Moyers wanted to end it. Shales may not believe that, but it would be nice if he at least acknowledged there was a difference of opinion on the subject.

“Need to Know” may indeed stink. But Shales hasn’t proven it.

Battle of the Network Billionaires.

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

I generally avoid linking to stuff that’s already on FARK, but this is too good and too relevant not to note here.

Ross Perot, Jr., who owns 5% of the Dallas Mavericks, is suing Mark Cuban, the majority owner of the team. Perot Jr. claims that the team is “insolvent and/or in imminent danger of insolvency”. Cuban states “The Mavs operations and debt are guaranteed by me. There is no risk of insolvency. Everyone always has been and will be paid on time.”

Cuban has a blog, and blogs about the Mavericks from time to time, but there’s nothing there yet about this case. I’ll try to update if he does make a statement, though I suspect his lawyers are advising him to play it close to the vest.

Obit watch.

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

I don’t really have a lot to say about Frank Frazetta or Lena Horne, but just for the record, here’s links:

Frazetta LAT obit. Frazetta NYT obit.

Horne LAT obit. Horne NYT obit.

Stonehenge.

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

I’ve been clicking through some articles on Jimbo’s site about the Seattle P.D. stomping incident, and ran across some things that made me go “Hmmmm.”

From the linked article:

Police records show that about 1:15 a.m. that night, four Hispanic men walked up to a man in the China Harbor parking lot and told him to give up his money. One pulled a 3-inch machete.

A three inch machete? I ran that past Lawrence, and his response was, “Did the bad guy also pull out the action figure that came with it?”

The same article links to the Seattle P.D. report on the incident. From that document:

<redacted> said that Suspect 1 pulled out a 3′ machete.

Three feet is a bit more convincing. But let’s think about this. Three feet is 36 inches, or the size of a yardstick. Wikipedia defines a typical machete as being 12.8 to 24 inches long. Three feet is getting more into broadsword territory. How do you conceal something like that? Stuffed down a pant leg? What does the draw stroke look like?

Lawrence pointed out that Jason’s machete in the Friday the 13th movies is three feet long; all the reproductions of that I can find online are not sharpened, though I suppose that can be fixed easily with a grindstone and some time.

I spent a great deal of time trying to find the Spinal Tap Stonehenge video on YouTube, but the only version I found does not appear to be embeddable. So I’ll leave you with this:

Not a 3" machete.

The Thin Blue Line (part 2).

Saturday, May 8th, 2010

The story gets more interesting.

The Statesman states they’ve managed to get a copy of the independent report on the shooting incident involving Officer Quintana.

The 162-page report by KeyPoint Government Solutions, which was hired by the City of Austin to independently investigate the fatal shooting of Nathaniel Sanders II, reached conclusions that stand in contrast to the findings of police Chief Art Acevedo, who found that Quintana had not used excessive force or poor tactics. The consultant’s report was completed last fall, but its key findings were kept secret.

The report also said Quintana’s tactics in the moments before the May 11, 2009, shooting were far worse than careless or negligent and instead bluntly declared them “reckless.” Investigators wrote in the report that they were “mindful of the legal import of the term.”

Note that Chief Acevedo rejects the findings of this report, and has stated that the shooting was “objectively reasonable and within Austin Police Department policy.” Note that Office Quintana was no-billed by a grand jury.

It is also worth pointing out that the Statesman is reporting based on what they claim is the full version of the report. That version has not been released to the public; only heavily edited parts has been released, and the city is fighting against releasing the full version.

So how did the Statesman get it?

This week, American-Statesman reporter Tony Plohetski received a call from a person who did not identify himself and said he had a complete copy of the document. The man declined to say how he had possession of the report but agreed to meet Plohetski so he could review it. When they met, Plohetski did not recognize the man, who again did not identify himself. He allowed Plohetski to review it for nearly three hours.

Curious. Curious, indeed.

Dear New York Times…

Friday, May 7th, 2010

This is James Robinson.


He used to be a brigadier general in the National Guard. He’s a commercial airline pilot who is certified by the TSA to carry a gun in the cockpit. He was also on the terrorist watch list.

This is Michael Hicks.

He’s eight years old. He’s also on the terrorist watch list.

This was Ted Kennedy.

He was a United States Senator from Massachusetts. He was also, at one time, on the terrorist watch list.

Are you seriously suggesting that the rights of American citizens should be revoked, merely because their names have been added to a notoriously inaccurate list? Without due process of law?

What country do you people live in, anyway?

Friday Astros update.

Friday, May 7th, 2010

9-19, .321 winning percentage, 52.002 projected wins for the season.

The thin blue line.

Friday, May 7th, 2010

How should we treat police officers who make a mistake in their personal lives?

Clearly, it depends on the severity of the mistake. For the moment, though, let’s talk about something that’s a misdemeanor. Something like driving while intoxicated.

Should that officer lose his job? Does it make a difference if this was a first offense, or if there was a repeated pattern of DWI offenses? (For our purposes, we’re assuming that there were no injuries or property damage involved.)

Do the circumstances matter? Does it make a difference if the officer was out all night drinking at a “gentlemen’s club”? Does it make a difference if he turned down an offer to sleep it off at someone else’s house, and decided to drive home with a women he picked up?

Does it matter that he was carrying a weapon at the time he was arrested? Does it matter that he initially refused blood and breath tests; and when he was tested an unspecified number of hours later, he still tested over the limit?

Does it matter that he capped a guy last year, and was suspended for 15 days because he didn’t turn on the camera in his squad car?

I’m hesitant to take away someone’s rice bowl because of one mistake in their personal life. On the other hand, he’s a cop. We give him the power to carry a gun, to forcibly detain people, and even to shoot them. Don’t we have a right to expect “the highest levels of ethical conduct” from those people? Doesn’t DWI, even a first offense with no injuries, violate that expectation?

Or is the chief of police taking advantage of one mistake to get rid of an already controversial officer?

Heroes for more than one day.

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

(I originally had this as an “Edited to add” to the previous post, but decided that it deserved to be broken out into a stand-alone entry.)

Here’s something to get the taste of the last link out of your mouth, and restore your faith in humanity. The Los Angeles County District Attorney gave Courageous Citizen Awards to Quoleshna Elbert and Larry Harnisch yesterday. Ms. Elbert and Mr. Harnisch intervened in a brutal domestic violence incident at considerable personal risk; the victim lived, but sustained serious and permanent injuries.

This is noteworthy to me because Mr. Harnisch works for the LAT as a copy editor. He also runs the paper’s indispensable “Daily Mirror” blog, which highlights L.A. history using excerpts from the local papers. I’ve never had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Harnisch (though I hope to someday) but I’ve admired his work ever since reading his extensively researched takedown of the horrible Donald Wolfe book about the Black Dahlia murder.

Well done, sir, and thank you.

(Hattip: L.A. Observed.)

Random notes: May 6, 2010.

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

OMG! Faisal Shahzad had a Kel-Tec Sub Rifle 2000 in his car!

…all along he possessed a weapon that could have easily done extreme damage, one rapidly fired round at a time.

Later:

It is, in effect, a low-powered rifle. Unlike those of some rifles, its bullets probably would not penetrate a police officer’s bullet-resistant vest, a law enforcement official said.

And:

Unlike the Tec-9, it is not frequently used by criminals, the official said.

Meanwhile, Dana Milbank in the WP asks the musical question:

Is the NRA a terrorist organization?

What prompts this? The NRA’s opposition to barring people on the notoriously unreliable terrorist watch list from purchasing guns.

In other news: Houston rapper that nobody’s ever heard of files lawsuit against local radio station for not playing his “music”.

Trae is suing for general damages to his reputation, character, standing in the community, mental suffering, loss of professional opportunities, performance revenue and record royalties.

I’m looking forward to seeing what legal precedent his lawyer sites that requires a radio station to play someone’s music. Could I sue KGSR for not playing Jonathan Coulton? Even better, could I sue KGSR for playing Kasey Chambers?

Edited to add: “Washington Post puts Newsweek up for sale. Do I hear $1? Anyone?

Provider 1 bids 300 quatloos on the newcomers.

Edited to add 2: I have been in the practice of noting Roger Ebert’s better negative reviews, especially the one-star and zero-star reviews. A zero-star review from Ebert is pretty rare; he’s stated in the past that for a film to get no stars, it not only has to be bad, but morally reprehensible in some way.

Accordingly, I am going to link to this zero-star Ebert review. I am not going to name the film. I do not encourage you to click on the link. I had heard about this film previously on FARK, and wish I had not.