Archive for the ‘Books’ Category

Updates from the Department of Mixology.

Monday, December 27th, 2010

I did want to note the updated “Perfect Martini” recipe from Jim Coudal at Coudal Partners. I’m impressed with the seriousness of intent expressed in the recipe, and the background material about the changes in Nolly Prat is interesting. (Nolly Prat is our preferred vermouth, but we’ve been looking for others, and will have to give the Dollin a try.)

However, I am automatically skeptical of any “perfect martini” recipe that calls for vodka. While I allow room in my universe for the vodka martini, I do so reluctantly; the “perfect martini” should be gin-based. (I am especially skeptical when the recipe refers to a specific brand of vodka. Vodka, by definition, is a neutral grain spirit, so what the author is really saying is “I prefer the impurities in Belvedere Vodka to those in other vodkas.”)

Coudal’s “Friday Drink Links” looks like a good cache of stuff to browse, though.

(Hattip: Daring Fireball.)

And among the things Santa brought me was a copy of The Hour: A Cocktail Manifesto; full report when I’ve had a chance to read it.

Speaking of books.

Friday, December 17th, 2010

I’m finishing up The World That Never Was: A True Story of Dreamers, Schemers, Anarchists, and Secret Agents. This is the kind of book about which Howard Waldrop would say, “I spent a whole bunch of time doing the research for this story, and then, after I finished, some guy came along and wrote a book that had all the stuff I dug up already in it.” Or words to that effect, anyway.

I’m a bit hesitant about posting a review before I’m done (though right now I’m just reading the endnotes and bibliography). However, Reason did a pretty good review of the book in their January issue: here’s the link. I agree with Brian Doherty that is annoying to see Butterworth play up the anarchist movement/radical Islam angle in the introduction, and then drop it for the rest of the book. The connection is worth considering, but I think there are reasons why it breaks down. For starters, the anarchist movement was never a movement that involved state actors, while radical Islam is. I’ll leave further discussion of that point up to the jihad correspondent…

The Decline of Western Civilization. (Part #N of a continuing series.)

Friday, December 17th, 2010

FarmVille For Dummies. Really.

We're doomed.

The Donald.

Tuesday, December 14th, 2010

Not Trump. Westlake.

An annotated list covering “all of Donald E. Westlake’s major fiction, his lone book of reportage, and three important essays”. I’m a big Westlake fan, and there’s stuff in here I didn’t know about, like Under an English Heaven. (I’d place The Hook over The Ax, personally, but that’s just me. Other than that, I think the list is pretty spot on.)

Amusingly, Lame Excuse Books just delivered my copy of Hellcats and Honeygirls.

Edited to add: Also amusingly, Lame Excuse Books is sending out a new catalog this week. Books from Lame Excuse Books make fine, fine Christmas presents for the SF, fantasy, or horror reader in your life.

(Hattip: Bill Crider.)

Quote of the day.

Wednesday, December 8th, 2010

“What the f**k does that mean?”

–John Gruber @ Daring Fireball

John:

It’s okay. Everyone has that reaction when reading Rob Enderle. Why don’t you sit down calmly, take a stress pill, and read something soothing, like the works of H.L. Mencken?

(Speaking of taking a stress pill, I would not be upset to find one of these in my stocking on Christmas morning.)

(Speaking of the works of H.L. Mencken, I am reminded that I need to add Prejudices: The Complete Series to my Amazon wish list.)

“This is indeed the father and mother of a tapeworm.”

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

I don’t have a lot that’s profound or interesting to say about WikiLeaks, and much of what I could say has been said better elsewhere.

But as it happens, I’ve got a copy of John Brunner’s The Shockwave Rider sitting on the table next to me. And for some reason, I’m reminded of the little interstitial bits of text throughout the novel, especially towards the end (“This product contains a known allergen and a known carcinogen…This is a cybernetic datum imprinted on the wrapper without the manufacturers’ knowledge or consent.”)

I’m increasingly convinced that Brunner got it right. Not the small details of what the society of the Internet would look like, but I think he’s batting close to 100% on the big picture.

Random notes: November 23, 2010.

Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010

Fat, drunk, and escorting nuclear weapons is no way to go through life, son.

(I haven’t checked FARK to see if they used that headline. If they didn’t, they should have.)

Anne Dick and The Search for Philip K. Dick in the NYT.

Quote of the day.

Monday, November 22nd, 2010

Over the weekend, I picked up a copy of David Chadwick’s Crooked Cucumber: The Life and Zen Teaching of Shunryu Suzuki.

I haven’t read it yet, and I’m going to be up to my eyebrows in the Iranian Revolution for the next week, but I did find one rather striking exchange while flipping through the book.

The setup for this is that a group of Suzuki’s students were sitting around with Suzuki talking about some book “about the meeting of East and West”. The students were making comparisons between East and West, and the West was getting the short end of the stick.

As conversation continued in this vein, Suzuki spoke up, obviously upset. “If you want to be a good Buddhist,” he said, “first you’re going to have to learn how to be a good Christian.” Then he got up and walked out.

Recent reading.

Monday, November 15th, 2010

My opinion of the Civil War is well known within my circle of friends. In brief, I find the Civil War for the most part a rather uninteresting area of history, and think far too much attention is given to it. I would rather see 1/10th of the amount of attention devoted to the Civil War given to the American Revolution. Or Vietnam. Or Prohibition. (Don’t ask me about the Compromise of 1850. Just don’t.)

That said, I was shocked at how much I liked James Swanson’s Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln’s Killer. I think part of the reason I enjoyed it so much is that Swanson chose to write his book more in the style of a true crime work, rather than a standard history. I’ve been waiting for his sequel, Bloody Crimes: The Chase for Jefferson Davis and the Death Pageant for Lincoln’s Corpse, since I finished Manhunt, and I’m happy to be able to say that Bloody Crimes is a worthy successor.

Swanson tells two parallel stories in Bloody Crimes. The first story is: what happened after Lincoln’s death? Swanson does give us some preliminary material about the last few days of Lincoln’s life: his visit to Richmond, his premonitions of death, and briefly recaps the assassination itself. But his main focus is on the after death pageant, the decision making that went into it, how it was pulled together, and how it was carried off. Part of Swanson’s argument is that Lincoln’s funeral train went a long way towards healing the wounds of the Civil War. The exhibition of Lincoln’s corpse, and the public grief that accompanied it, in some way gave the nation closure, and permission to mourn the Union’s Civil War dead. In some way, Lincoln wasn’t just a martyred president; he was a symbol of all the Union soldiers who fell, and his funeral train was exactly the national catharsis the United States needed at the time.

The other half of Swanson’s story is Jefferson Davis. What happened to him, and to the Confederacy, after Lee’s surrender? Davis was at one point the most wanted man in the country – probably even more so than Booth, while Booth was still alive – and his capture ended the Confederacy. Yet within two years of his capture, Davis had gone from “sure to be tried for treason and executed” to free man. What happened? And how did Davis live out the rest of his life? How do you go from leader of a free nation to private citizen, especially after you’ve lost much of your wealth in the war? I’ll confess that I really never thought about these questions with respect to the late Jefferson Davis, but Swanson answers them, and makes the answers interesting. One of Swanson’s great accomplishments in Bloody Crimes is that he manages to make Davis a sympathetic and honorable figure (as Swanson shows, Davis was more honorable than some of his captors) without apologizing for the Confederacy and what it stood for.

I commend Swanson’s books to your attention. But I do wonder what he’s going to write about next, now that he’s seemingly exhausted the possibilities of the late Civil War period?

Another recent book that I’ve mentioned previously, finally managed to find, and enjoyed the heck out of, is Max Watman’s Chasing the White Dog: An Amateur Outlaw’s Adventures in Moonshine. You might be surprised to know that there’s basically two branches of contemporary moonshine making. On the one hand, you’ve got contemporary American micro-distillers, some of whom are fully licensed (such as Stranahan’s Colorado Whiskey, which Watman covers in depth), and some of whom operate just outside the law thanks to stupid government regulations. (It is perfectly legal to produce up to 300 gallons of beer yearly for your own use. But God forbid that you try to distill your own booze, even for personal use; there’s no legal way to do that without expensive government licensing and paperwork.) On the other hand, you have the descendants of the old moonshiners in places like the Smith Mountain Lake area of Virginia, who are still producing shine and skirting the law. Except the shine that they produce now is of much lower quality: basically, industrial strength hooch designed to get you messed up fast and cheap, and sold mostly in poor urban areas. Watman does an excellent job of presenting the case for legalized micro-distilling, while at the same time acknowledging that moonshine production has lost much of the luster it had in the Junior Johnson days. (Yes, he does talk to Junior, who’s licensed his name to a fully legal micro-distiller, and is producing his own branded moonshine.) Watman also discusses his own adventures in moonshine production; he makes me want to see if I can find (or build) a small still of my own. (A quick search of Smartflix does not turn up any how-to videos on still building, though, darn the luck.)

Watman’s book also gets an enthusiastic recommendation from me.

Random notes: November 4, 2010.

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

Remember the Vietnam War? It was in all the papers. Anyway, the LAT has an interesting article about the POW bracelets that were popular at the time. Oddly enough, this came up in a recent family discussion…

So let’s see. People living in illegal lofts in NYC get a law passed in an attempt to make their lofts legal, and, in the process, bring those lofts under the same laws regulating other residential housing in NYC (including “rent stabliziation”). Loft owners respond as you might expect. Tenants are outraged. Film at 11.

Speaking of outrage, I usually don’t join in with Internet lynch mobs, but this…this train wreck is just too good to pass up. I’m reminded of something Harlan Ellison once said. Loosely paraphrased: arrogance you can work around. Stupidity you can deal with. But arrogant stupidity? There’s no cure for that.

Edited to add: Oh, yes. I knew there was something else I wanted to mention: this Slate review of The Anthology of Rap, in which the reviewer complains that the book is full of transcription errors. Transcribing rap lyrics is hard? You don’t say.

This one’s for Mike the Musicologist.

Monday, October 25th, 2010

Stephen Sondheim’s 1966 made-for-TV musical, “Evening Primrose”, starring Anthony Perkins (no kidding) is coming out on DVD Tuesday.

Just in case you were wondering where you could find it and how much it goes for, here’s a link to “Evening Primrose” on Amazon.

Interestingly, Tuesday is also the day that Sondheim’s Finishing the Hat: Collected Lyrics (1954-1981) with Attendant Comments, Principles, Heresies, Grudges, Whines and Anecdotes will be released.

I blame George Bush.

Saturday, October 23rd, 2010

The Texas Rangers are in the World Series.

Let me repeat that: the Texas Rangers are in the World Series.

Yes, those Texas Rangers.

Zen and the art of military service.

Friday, October 15th, 2010

I’m fascinated by Zen.

I don’t practice it. I’ve thought about it, but

  1. I’m not sure how I would reconcile that with my other beliefs.
  2. I have problems with some aspects of Zen thought. For example, there’s a precept, “If you pick up a stone, you must be prepared to pick up all the suffering of the world.” What does that mean? Should we not try to help other people, lest we become responsible for their suffering? I’ll tell you truthfully, there are times when that appeals to me, but in the end, I can’t just stand back and not pick up the stone. Even when I suspect it would be better for everyone involved if I left it on the ground.

That said, I love reading about Zen. I’ve particularly enjoyed Shoes Outside the Door, a warts and all history of the San Francisco Zen Center, and Street Zen: The Life and Work of Issan Dorsey. Dorsey in particular is a fascinating character to me; if I were to take up Zen, I’d like to be like him (without the homosexuality and drug use, though).

I’ve got a bookmark on my system to Brad Warner’s wonderful “Zen Books That Don’t Suck” page, and will probably check a few more of those off the list as I find them. I’ve got to like a guy who not only practices Zen, but is a fan of monster movies and Ghoulardi.

Anyway, Warner also has a blog, and I wanted to highlight this post in particular (scroll down below the schedule information for the meat). I don’t know why, but there’s something about Warner’s response, and the way he phrases it, that I find deeply moving.

Peace has to be defended by people who are trained to kill those who would destroy it. I’m sorry. But that’s the way things are.

I wish this was not true. And I can wish all I want but that won’t make it so.

“I can wish all I want but that won’t make it so” reminds me of a ha-ha only serious joke I’ve used from time to time in business settings:

Q: How many legs does a dog have, if you call a tail a leg?

A: Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn’t make it one.

Punch!

Friday, October 15th, 2010

One of the things I’ve noticed in my reading of cocktail history is the emphasis on “punch” during the 18th and 19th centuries. Historically, it seems that the communal drink served in a large bowl was much, much more popular during that time period, and then abruptly dropped off – probably, like many other aspects of 18th and 19th century cocktail culture, killed off by Prohibition.

Frank Bruni, in “The Tipsy Diaries” from today’s NYT, has a nifty profile of David Wondrich, the guy who wrote Imbibe! (a “biography”, for want of a better word, of the legendary early mixologist Jerry Thomas). Wondrich has a new book coming out: Punch: The Delights (and Dangers) of the Flowing Bowl, and Bruni’s piece ties into that.

There’s a couple of things in the Bruni article that I find interesting. One is that you can apparently still purchase ambergris (I love the description of it as “clotted whale cholesterol”). I was also delighted to read that Wonderich became interested in mixology after reading Barnaby Conrad’s Absinthe: History in a Bottle, which was also one of the books that got me interested in cocktail culture.

You’ve got to know when to Myhrvold them…

Thursday, September 23rd, 2010

Nathan Myhrvold, the former chief technology officer of Microsoft, has a new “cookbook” coming out “sometime in the not-too-distant future”, says the LAT.

(According to Amazon, Modernist Cuisine: The Art and Science of Cooking is set to be released March 7, 2011. And it’s going to go for $500 – but, hey, you can get free shipping with Amazon Prime!)

“The food world eagerly awaits the former Microsoft technology officer’s book on the science of cooking.”

I don’t know that I’m really representative of the food world, but speaking strictly for myself: no. I’d much rather read Ferran Adrià’s book, or a cookbook by the guys behind the “Cooking Issues” blog.