Archive for the ‘Books’ Category

Book geekery.

Wednesday, January 12th, 2011

By way of TJIC, I found this nifty little query page that lists the NYT bestsellers for your birth week (both fiction and non-fiction).

I’m kind of embarrassed to admit that I’ve only read one book on the list for my birth week. On the one hand, NYT bestseller lists seem to be dominated by a fair amount of transient crud; on the other hand, I’ve actually read more of the books on TJIC’s list (three total) than my own. (Believe it or not, I’ve read Boss. Within the past couple of years, even. And the closest I’ve ever been to Chicago is changing planes in the airport.)

I am halfway tempted to start a project of blogging my way through the books for my birth week, just for grins.

And while I’m on the legal beat…

Tuesday, January 11th, 2011

Alex Tabarrok, one of the Marginal Revolution bloggers, has an interesting article in the latest Wilson Quarterly about the economics of bounty hunting.

In Philadelphia, where commercial bail has been regulated out of existence, The Philadelphia Inquirer recently found that “fugitives jump bail . . . with virtual impunity.” At the end of 2009, the City of Brotherly Love had more than 47,000 unserved arrest warrants. About the only time the city’s bail jumpers are recaptured is when they are arrested for some other crime. One would expect that a criminal on the lam would be careful not to get caught speeding, but foresight is rarely a prominent characteristic of bail jumpers. Routine stops ensnare more than a few of them. When the jails are crowded, however, even serial bail jumpers are often released.

Edited to add: Just for grins, I thought I’d throw in a couple of links to Paladin Press books on bounty hunting, such as “Rex Venator”‘s Modern Bounty Hunting: A Real-Life Guide for the Bail Fugitive Recovery Agent. Holy cow! You can get Paladin Press books on your Kindle now? Man, this is a great country.

A handful of randomness.

Wednesday, January 5th, 2011

I intended to post this yesterday, but got sidetracked: the SF Weekly and the Bay Guardian have reached a settlement in their legal dispute. I’ve previously blogged about the dispute here, here, and here. (Hattip: Jimbo.)

I’m posting this only because it amuses me: the Statesman has posted the APD’s annual list of “local bars where drunken driving suspects reported having their last drink before hitting the road”. Particularly chuckleworthy to me is the large cluster of places in one block of 6th Street…

Speaking of the Statesman, there’s also a kind of neat profile of Austin writer, former Dell employee, and MonkeyBrain Books publisher Chris Roberson, who is taking over the current “Superman” story line with issue 707.

And speaking of things that amuse me, “Never Said About Restaurant Websites” pretty much hits all of my peeves (and Lawrence’s) save one. And we’ve both submitted that one. (Hattip: Daring Fireball.)

Edited to add: Here’s something else I wanted to blog but forgot: “The Now-You-See-It Restaurant“.

He signed a short-term lease for a space in SoHo whose landlord cannot promise that the building, likely to be demolished, will be around past July. In return he received a rent of about $9,000 a month, well below market rate.

He’s not paying for, or bothering with, a proper sign out front. The dozens of chairs, used, were bought on eBay for under $10 each, and if they’re not so durable, no sweat.

The bar, a mobile cart, will be stocked with only one brand of each spirit, and on a given night there will be just two whites, two reds and one sparkling wine.

Diners, for example, will be expected to set and reset the cutlery on their tables with utensils from drawers beneath. That way Mr. Fraser won’t need as many servers. It will save him money, he said, and translate into fewer intrusions for diners. “You’re visited only at points of the meal when you really need help,” he said.

Today’s bulletin from the Department of WTF?

Monday, January 3rd, 2011

The NYT has a regular feature, “Recipe Redux”, where Times writers revisit a classic recipe from the pages of the NYT, and attempt to update it for contemporary tastes/styles/availability of ingredients.

This week’s recipe was for Chocolate-Rum Mousse; the original actually sounds pretty good, at least to my unsophisticated palate.

So how did the NYT‘s chefs (Alex Talbot and Aki Kamozawa, who run the Ideas In Food website) update this recipe?

Talbot and Kamozawa considered making a terrine lined with the chocolate mousse and layering it with popcorn and more mousse, so the popcorn would behave like the chocolate wafers in icebox cake, softening and melding with the mousse.

Should have gone with that idea; sounds good to me. But, no:

Talbot and Kamozawa substituted beets for chocolate in the original recipe

Beets? Beets?! Were these people not loved enough as children?

Okay, let’s be fair: how did it come out?

After blending it together, 1966-style, they had a mousse that they liked a lot but didn’t quite love.

So…

…they whipped out their handy ISI dispenser (handy for some; it’s that magical tool that drove the foam craze) and made the mousse into a cloud.

To the cloud! Sorry. Here’s what I think they’re referring to when they talk about an ISI dispenser.

I asked Talbot whether readers might be daunted by a recipe that calls for an ISI dispenser. “We’ve grown and matured,” Talbot said, “and realized any recipe you put out there, no one really follows it. All it is is a suggestion: you might want to do this.”

Yeah. The original recipe sounds simple, straightforward, and relatively easy to prepare with nothing more than a blender and a stove. The new one requires relatively specialized kitchen equipment and sounds like crap.

I have to ask: if you did a side-to-side, A-B comparison, would Mr. Latte approve?

Updates from the Department of Mixology.

Monday, December 27th, 2010

I did want to note the updated “Perfect Martini” recipe from Jim Coudal at Coudal Partners. I’m impressed with the seriousness of intent expressed in the recipe, and the background material about the changes in Nolly Prat is interesting. (Nolly Prat is our preferred vermouth, but we’ve been looking for others, and will have to give the Dollin a try.)

However, I am automatically skeptical of any “perfect martini” recipe that calls for vodka. While I allow room in my universe for the vodka martini, I do so reluctantly; the “perfect martini” should be gin-based. (I am especially skeptical when the recipe refers to a specific brand of vodka. Vodka, by definition, is a neutral grain spirit, so what the author is really saying is “I prefer the impurities in Belvedere Vodka to those in other vodkas.”)

Coudal’s “Friday Drink Links” looks like a good cache of stuff to browse, though.

(Hattip: Daring Fireball.)

And among the things Santa brought me was a copy of The Hour: A Cocktail Manifesto; full report when I’ve had a chance to read it.

Speaking of books.

Friday, December 17th, 2010

I’m finishing up The World That Never Was: A True Story of Dreamers, Schemers, Anarchists, and Secret Agents. This is the kind of book about which Howard Waldrop would say, “I spent a whole bunch of time doing the research for this story, and then, after I finished, some guy came along and wrote a book that had all the stuff I dug up already in it.” Or words to that effect, anyway.

I’m a bit hesitant about posting a review before I’m done (though right now I’m just reading the endnotes and bibliography). However, Reason did a pretty good review of the book in their January issue: here’s the link. I agree with Brian Doherty that is annoying to see Butterworth play up the anarchist movement/radical Islam angle in the introduction, and then drop it for the rest of the book. The connection is worth considering, but I think there are reasons why it breaks down. For starters, the anarchist movement was never a movement that involved state actors, while radical Islam is. I’ll leave further discussion of that point up to the jihad correspondent

The Decline of Western Civilization. (Part #N of a continuing series.)

Friday, December 17th, 2010

FarmVille For Dummies. Really.

We're doomed.

The Donald.

Tuesday, December 14th, 2010

Not Trump. Westlake.

An annotated list covering “all of Donald E. Westlake’s major fiction, his lone book of reportage, and three important essays”. I’m a big Westlake fan, and there’s stuff in here I didn’t know about, like Under an English Heaven. (I’d place The Hook over The Ax, personally, but that’s just me. Other than that, I think the list is pretty spot on.)

Amusingly, Lame Excuse Books just delivered my copy of Hellcats and Honeygirls.

Edited to add: Also amusingly, Lame Excuse Books is sending out a new catalog this week. Books from Lame Excuse Books make fine, fine Christmas presents for the SF, fantasy, or horror reader in your life.

(Hattip: Bill Crider.)

Quote of the day.

Wednesday, December 8th, 2010

“What the f**k does that mean?”

John Gruber @ Daring Fireball

John:

It’s okay. Everyone has that reaction when reading Rob Enderle. Why don’t you sit down calmly, take a stress pill, and read something soothing, like the works of H.L. Mencken?

(Speaking of taking a stress pill, I would not be upset to find one of these in my stocking on Christmas morning.)

(Speaking of the works of H.L. Mencken, I am reminded that I need to add Prejudices: The Complete Series to my Amazon wish list.)

“This is indeed the father and mother of a tapeworm.”

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

I don’t have a lot that’s profound or interesting to say about WikiLeaks, and much of what I could say has been said better elsewhere.

But as it happens, I’ve got a copy of John Brunner’s The Shockwave Rider sitting on the table next to me. And for some reason, I’m reminded of the little interstitial bits of text throughout the novel, especially towards the end (“This product contains a known allergen and a known carcinogen…This is a cybernetic datum imprinted on the wrapper without the manufacturers’ knowledge or consent.”)

I’m increasingly convinced that Brunner got it right. Not the small details of what the society of the Internet would look like, but I think he’s batting close to 100% on the big picture.

Random notes: November 23, 2010.

Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010

Fat, drunk, and escorting nuclear weapons is no way to go through life, son.

(I haven’t checked FARK to see if they used that headline. If they didn’t, they should have.)

Anne Dick and The Search for Philip K. Dick in the NYT.

Quote of the day.

Monday, November 22nd, 2010

Over the weekend, I picked up a copy of David Chadwick’s Crooked Cucumber: The Life and Zen Teaching of Shunryu Suzuki.

I haven’t read it yet, and I’m going to be up to my eyebrows in the Iranian Revolution for the next week, but I did find one rather striking exchange while flipping through the book.

The setup for this is that a group of Suzuki’s students were sitting around with Suzuki talking about some book “about the meeting of East and West”. The students were making comparisons between East and West, and the West was getting the short end of the stick.

As conversation continued in this vein, Suzuki spoke up, obviously upset. “If you want to be a good Buddhist,” he said, “first you’re going to have to learn how to be a good Christian.” Then he got up and walked out.

Recent reading.

Monday, November 15th, 2010

My opinion of the Civil War is well known within my circle of friends. In brief, I find the Civil War for the most part a rather uninteresting area of history, and think far too much attention is given to it. I would rather see 1/10th of the amount of attention devoted to the Civil War given to the American Revolution. Or Vietnam. Or Prohibition. (Don’t ask me about the Compromise of 1850. Just don’t.)

That said, I was shocked at how much I liked James Swanson’s Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln’s Killer. I think part of the reason I enjoyed it so much is that Swanson chose to write his book more in the style of a true crime work, rather than a standard history. I’ve been waiting for his sequel, Bloody Crimes: The Chase for Jefferson Davis and the Death Pageant for Lincoln’s Corpse, since I finished Manhunt, and I’m happy to be able to say that Bloody Crimes is a worthy successor.

Swanson tells two parallel stories in Bloody Crimes. The first story is: what happened after Lincoln’s death? Swanson does give us some preliminary material about the last few days of Lincoln’s life: his visit to Richmond, his premonitions of death, and briefly recaps the assassination itself. But his main focus is on the after death pageant, the decision making that went into it, how it was pulled together, and how it was carried off. Part of Swanson’s argument is that Lincoln’s funeral train went a long way towards healing the wounds of the Civil War. The exhibition of Lincoln’s corpse, and the public grief that accompanied it, in some way gave the nation closure, and permission to mourn the Union’s Civil War dead. In some way, Lincoln wasn’t just a martyred president; he was a symbol of all the Union soldiers who fell, and his funeral train was exactly the national catharsis the United States needed at the time.

The other half of Swanson’s story is Jefferson Davis. What happened to him, and to the Confederacy, after Lee’s surrender? Davis was at one point the most wanted man in the country – probably even more so than Booth, while Booth was still alive – and his capture ended the Confederacy. Yet within two years of his capture, Davis had gone from “sure to be tried for treason and executed” to free man. What happened? And how did Davis live out the rest of his life? How do you go from leader of a free nation to private citizen, especially after you’ve lost much of your wealth in the war? I’ll confess that I really never thought about these questions with respect to the late Jefferson Davis, but Swanson answers them, and makes the answers interesting. One of Swanson’s great accomplishments in Bloody Crimes is that he manages to make Davis a sympathetic and honorable figure (as Swanson shows, Davis was more honorable than some of his captors) without apologizing for the Confederacy and what it stood for.

I commend Swanson’s books to your attention. But I do wonder what he’s going to write about next, now that he’s seemingly exhausted the possibilities of the late Civil War period?

Another recent book that I’ve mentioned previously, finally managed to find, and enjoyed the heck out of, is Max Watman’s Chasing the White Dog: An Amateur Outlaw’s Adventures in Moonshine. You might be surprised to know that there’s basically two branches of contemporary moonshine making. On the one hand, you’ve got contemporary American micro-distillers, some of whom are fully licensed (such as Stranahan’s Colorado Whiskey, which Watman covers in depth), and some of whom operate just outside the law thanks to stupid government regulations. (It is perfectly legal to produce up to 300 gallons of beer yearly for your own use. But God forbid that you try to distill your own booze, even for personal use; there’s no legal way to do that without expensive government licensing and paperwork.) On the other hand, you have the descendants of the old moonshiners in places like the Smith Mountain Lake area of Virginia, who are still producing shine and skirting the law. Except the shine that they produce now is of much lower quality: basically, industrial strength hooch designed to get you messed up fast and cheap, and sold mostly in poor urban areas. Watman does an excellent job of presenting the case for legalized micro-distilling, while at the same time acknowledging that moonshine production has lost much of the luster it had in the Junior Johnson days. (Yes, he does talk to Junior, who’s licensed his name to a fully legal micro-distiller, and is producing his own branded moonshine.) Watman also discusses his own adventures in moonshine production; he makes me want to see if I can find (or build) a small still of my own. (A quick search of Smartflix does not turn up any how-to videos on still building, though, darn the luck.)

Watman’s book also gets an enthusiastic recommendation from me.

Random notes: November 4, 2010.

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

Remember the Vietnam War? It was in all the papers. Anyway, the LAT has an interesting article about the POW bracelets that were popular at the time. Oddly enough, this came up in a recent family discussion…

So let’s see. People living in illegal lofts in NYC get a law passed in an attempt to make their lofts legal, and, in the process, bring those lofts under the same laws regulating other residential housing in NYC (including “rent stabliziation”). Loft owners respond as you might expect. Tenants are outraged. Film at 11.

Speaking of outrage, I usually don’t join in with Internet lynch mobs, but thisthis train wreck is just too good to pass up. I’m reminded of something Harlan Ellison once said. Loosely paraphrased: arrogance you can work around. Stupidity you can deal with. But arrogant stupidity? There’s no cure for that.

Edited to add: Oh, yes. I knew there was something else I wanted to mention: this Slate review of The Anthology of Rap, in which the reviewer complains that the book is full of transcription errors. Transcribing rap lyrics is hard? You don’t say.

This one’s for Mike the Musicologist.

Monday, October 25th, 2010

Stephen Sondheim’s 1966 made-for-TV musical, “Evening Primrose”, starring Anthony Perkins (no kidding) is coming out on DVD Tuesday.

Just in case you were wondering where you could find it and how much it goes for, here’s a link to “Evening Primrose” on Amazon.

Interestingly, Tuesday is also the day that Sondheim’s Finishing the Hat: Collected Lyrics (1954-1981) with Attendant Comments, Principles, Heresies, Grudges, Whines and Anecdotes will be released.