Archive for the ‘Media’ Category

Yo! Omar’s covering up!

Wednesday, October 24th, 2012

Remember James Kwon, “Maritime Director” of the Port of Oakland? Mister “Spent $4,500 on strippers at Treasures”?

New developments: Mr. Kwon has a boss, “Executive Director” Omar Benjamin.

Port officials, however, redacted Benjamin’s name from the copies of the party receipts that were turned over to us and others in response to public-records requests. According to a source close to the investigation, Benjamin insisted he didn’t remember being at the club.

Would you like to guess what Mr. Kwon is saying? Yes: not only was his boss at Treasures, but Mr. Benjamin actually authorized him to pick up the tab. Mr. Benjamin and Mr. Kwon are both on paid suspensions from their positions.

Also, the receipt in question “listed a half dozen directors and vice presidents from BNSF Railway as being in attendance”. This is interesting, because the port claims they followed “‘a standard protocol of redacting the names of all persons that appeared on the reports’ – except the person named in a media public-records request” in explaining why Mr. Benjamin’s name was redacted from the receipt. So if they redacted all the names, how were the BNSF directors listed?

Setting that aside, though, BNSF says that they’ve checked travel records and spoken to their people, and there’s “no evidence its executives were at the party, or even in Houston at the time”. (If they were in Houston, it could have been perfectly legit, as there was a conference going on.)

The way the press is treating this story also strikes me as odd. Both the SFChron and the HouChron seem to be treating this as more of a gossip column item (the HouChron even reprinting, word for word, the SF paper’s story) instead of a story about political corruption, while the Oakland paper seems to be totally silent about the entire issue.

Is it the strippers? Do the papers just not take stories that feature strippers seriously? Remember: it was a stripper that brought down Wilbur Mills.

Random notes: October 18, 2012.

Thursday, October 18th, 2012

Now that we’ve had the better part of a day, here’s the Statesman‘s coverage of Lance Armstrong’s resignation, as well as his dumping by Nike, Trek, Radio Shack, and 24-Hour Fitness.

As soon as USADA brought charges against Armstrong in August, questions emerged about what would happen to Livestrong. But since Aug. 23, the foundation has received 16,468 donations at an average of $97, twice the normal levels, said spokeswoman Rae Bazzarre.

On the other hand, the Ride for the Roses (Livestrong’s major annual event) is coming up this weekend; did that cause a donation spike, or is the increase in donations over and above the normal run-up to the event?

The HouChron has been running articles on events at the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas. There’s a controversy over the organization’s grant approval process: the organization gave M.D. Anderson an $18 million grant to work on commercial production of cancer drugs, over the objections of various scientists who did scientific reviews and grant evaluations for the institute. Now, the agency’s two leading scientific officers (both of whom are Nobel laureates) and all of the other reviewers have resigned.

By the way, CPRIT is a state agency, established by a constitutional amendment in 2007, and funded with $3 billion in state issued bonds. And guess who was behind the campaign for CPRIT?

Newsweek has snuffed it.
At least in print. The magazine is going all digital, which should be interesting; why would I pay for a subscription to a magazine that summarizes all the news I read online the week before?

And on a related note.

Monday, October 1st, 2012

Since we’re into October, I wonder if it is time to start rounding up candidates for the Dumbest Article Printed In a Large Circulation Publication In 2012.

I could go through my “stupid” tag, but most of those entries are for heroic individual acts of stupidity, and not articles from the mass media.

I could throw things open to my readers, but every time I do throw things open to my readers, I get, shall we say, a less than deafening response.

Then again, I can’t dance, and it is too wet to plow still, so….

…put your candidates for “Dumbest Article Printed In a Large Circulation Publication In 2012” into the comments, or email them to me at stainles at gmail dot com if you want to remain monogamous anonymous.

I do think we need some ground rules:

  • Both traditional print and web-based publications are eligible.
  • I will accept nominations of individual articles from Salon and Slate, but I will not accept nominations of either of those sites as a whole. I will also judge submissions from those two sites more harshly than I do submissions from other sources, as both sites already have a reputation for publishing articles of enormous stupidity; thus, I hold them to a higher standard than I do supposedly reputable mass media such as the LAT.
  • I will accept nominations of individual articles from this site and the Saturday Dining Conspiracy web site, just to be fair.
  • “UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED, ESPECIALLY to COMPUTER BULLETIN BOARDS.”

We’ve already got the LAT pot growers of the Emerald Triangle story to work with. (Though, on second thought, is that a stupid story, or a smart story about stupid people?)

I’ll add to the list this fine Salon article from January, which John Scalzi ably dissected. (“…the seven most damaging words in the English language for the reputation of any novelist might very well be ‘I just wrote an article for Salon.'”)

Any more entries? I’m sure I’m forgetting something, probably in Slate.

Edited to add: Thinking about it some more, I realized that I left the definition of “Large Circulation Publication” undefined. For example, does a professional writer’s personal blog that gets a lot of traffic count as a “Large Circulation Publication”? I think my answer to that is: you post ’em, I print ’em.

Obit watch: September 30, 2012.

Sunday, September 30th, 2012

In case you were wondering how the paper of record would cover the death of former publisher Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, “who guided The New York Times and its parent company through a long, sometimes turbulent period of expansion and change on a scale not seen since the newspaper’s founding in 1851”, you can find that here.

If you were wondering how other papers would approach this: LAT. WP.

I’d also like to mention the death of noted racing journalist Chris Economaki. Back when I was a wee lad and watched racing coverage on ABC, Economaki and Jackie Stewart were always there. I miss those days…

Random thought.

Tuesday, September 25th, 2012

If I had a film of SuAnne at Lead (as far as I know, no such film exists) I would study it in slow motion frame by frame. There’s a magic in what she did, along with the promise that public acts of courage are still alive out there somewhere. Mostly, I would run the film of SuAnne again and again for my own braveheart song. I refer to her, as I do to Crazy Horse, for proof that it’s a public service to be brave.

—Ian Frazier, On the Rez

It’s a public service to be brave.

Headline of the day.

Thursday, September 20th, 2012

Where Is Cuba Going?

This is a surprisingly hard question to find an answer for, but the best information I’ve been able to find seems to point to Cuba moving steadily westward as the Atlantic Ocean widens and South America pushes upwards towards North America, until eventually (some 250 million years from now) the continents reassemble themselves as Pangea Ultima and Cuba is sucked under what’s left of the Atlantic Ocean.

Then again, that may not have been the question the NYT had in mind…

Morning random notes: September 4, 2012.

Tuesday, September 4th, 2012

Would you pay $18 for a 40-minute vinyl record of previously unreleased Charles Manson songs?

Yeah, I wouldn’t, either.

The album’s title, a vulgarity that means wasting time…

I want to come back to this later and elaborate on the idea some, but I’m getting more than a little tired of the mass media being coy in their reporting. (See also: Russian punk bands.)

Vasquez turned to the funding website Kickstarter to raise several thousand dollars to pay to have the album cover printed and 500 copies of the record pressed.

This kind of bothers me, too, but I’m not sure I can articulate why.

Headline in the NYT:

Gotham: A Summer of Easy Guns and Dead Children

First paragraph:

In Harlem, Paula Shaw-Leary talks of her youngest, Matt, who got his college degree in May and was accepted to graduate school…

Matt’s death is tragic, but a 21-year-old man who has been accepted to grad school is not a child.

(Gee, doesn’t NYC have strict gun control laws?)

I don’t think I ever saw anything Michael Clarke Duncan was in, and I wouldn’t say I was a big fan of his work. But 54 is just too young. (NYT. LAT. A/V Club.)

The Frank Lloyd Wright archive is moving to New York City. This sounds like a very good thing:

The models will live at MoMA, which has extensive conservation and exhibition experience. The museum will display them in periodic presentations and special exhibitions. The papers will be housed at Avery, whose librarians will make them available to researchers and educators starting at the end of next year.

(Well, a very good thing for everyone except Mike the Musicologist, who hates NYC.)

Headline from something called “The Root”, linked from the WP site:

Few African Americans at Burning Man

“Word Ends: Women, Minorities Hardest Hit”.

Random notes, September 3, 2012.

Monday, September 3rd, 2012

Workers of the world, unite! Dyslexics of the world, untie!

In 2009, the two-year-old Southern lifestyle magazine [Garden and Gun -DB ] lost financial support from its first publisher. Its employees, many of whom had relocated from New York City to work here, were left with dwindling buyout packages and the promise of freelance pay. Real estate developers could no longer afford to buy advertisements, and some new prospects said they would not give a cent to the magazine until the owners took “gun” out of its title.

Oh, yes. Garden and Gun. I remember them. I was considering subscribing: that is, until they refused ads from the NRA. Now they can die in a fire, as far as I am concerned.

In other news, the NYT wants you to know that you should be careful buying art online.

My big question for the day: now that Reverend Moon is dead, how long will the Washington Times be around? I’ve gotten the distinct impression that it has survived that long purely because he wanted it that way, and his successors are not as wild about the paper as he was.

Mike Nesbitt has resigned as offensive coordinator at the University of Houston. That would be two days after the season opener, which they lost 30-13 to Texas State.

I’ve been kind of tied up the past couple of days and haven’t had a chance to blog the Austin Police Department acting as agent provocateurs to Occupy Austin story. I don’t really know what to make of it, so instead I’ll refer you to the Statesman story above, and the coverage from Grits for Breakfast here. (The other problem I have with this story is that much of the coverage comes from sources I don’t read and don’t trust.)

Speaking of Grits, he also has an interesting followup on the Texas Highway Patrol Association and other similar scam organizations.

The Lazy Journalist’s Friend.

Friday, August 3rd, 2012

Summer is here? Slow news day? Your editor wants you to come up with something to fill space?

No worries, mate: you can always do a slideshow of weird crap you can buy from Amazon.

Random notes: July 3, 2012.

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2012

I think I’m going to wait until later tonight or tomorrow morning to do a roundup of Andy Griffith obits. In the meantime, how has the Criterion Collection not come out with an edition of “A Face In the Crowd”?

Here’s something I’m wondering about. There’s a story in the HouChron: I’ll link to it, but I won’t mention names. The gist of the story is that the sister of a state representative was arrested yesterday after a police raid found drugs and guns in her home. Reading between the lines of the honorable gentleman’s statement, it appears she has issues, if not a lifetime subscription and a complete set of bound volumes.

Question: why is this news? Would it have been newsworthy (outside of Corpus Christi) if her brother wasn’t a state rep? Does it matter that her brother happens to be a Republican? (I like to think I’d be asking the same question if he was a Democrat.)

In news that might actually be news: a while back, the Landry’s corporation got a tax abatement to build “The Inn at the Ballpark” . This was supposed to generate a certain number of jobs. According to a city audit, it didn’t generate the specified number.

So how did the Houston City Council respond? If you said “they voted not to ask Landry’s for the taxes they were previously exempted from”, take two gold stars…and you know the drill.

(Hattip: Lawrence. I’m aware that post has nothing to do with Landry’s, but I’ve been wanting to link it for a while.)

Cop watch: June 28, 2012.

Thursday, June 28th, 2012

I have not been able to give a flying flip at a rolling doughnut about the whole Drake/Chris Brown/Tony Parker kerfluffle. (If you are unaware of this, consider yourself lucky.) But there’s an interesting aspect to the story in today’s NYT.

W.i.P (the club where the fight broke out) and Greenhouse (another club) share both the building and a liquor license. Greenhouse has what the NYT characterizes as “a history of violence and other problems”. So…

…Faced with the prospect of being shut down, the owners signed an agreement with the Police Department in March 2011 that required them to scan the ID of everyone who passed through the club’s doors. The data was to be kept for at least 30 days, and provided to the police upon request.

Yep, that’s right. You go into a club, the club captures your ID, keeps it on file for 30 days, and gives it to the cops if they ask for it.

Gabriel Taussig, who heads the city Law Department’s administrative law division, said in a written response that starting in 2007, many nightclubs in the city had entered into agreements with the Police Department to scan the identification cards of patrons.

I’ve written previously about the Patricia Cook case (the woman who was shot by a cop in Culpepper, VA: the cop is now charged with murder). Reason has an interesting article about how the community used Facebook to draw attention to the case: the Facebook campaign led to increased press coverage and the discovery of a new witness. One thing that leaps out at me:

Local residents flooded the comment boards of the Star-Exponent*. Under the guise of anonymity, they defended “Pat” Cook, and called for an investigation into the Culpeper Police Department. “Two weeks after the shooting, [the publication] stopped that,” Jennings says of the message boards. “It deleted all the existing comments and all the existing discussion on that.” The paper relaunched with Facebook commenting, requiring people to identify themselves. At that point, the message boards for the small-town paper went silent. “I think people were afraid to speak up,” Jennings says, adding, “there are a couple of bullies in town.”

“Comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable,” indeed.

And do you remember Deputy James Mee of the LA County Sheriff’s Department? You might: he arrested Mel Gibson. Apparently, Mee later sued the department, claiming his superiors had tried to pressure him into removing Gibson’s anti-Semetic remarks from his report. Deputy Mee settled the suit for $50,000….

and now the department is planning to fire him.

[Richard A.] Shinee [Mee’s lawyer] said the department is trying to fire Mee over a June 17, 2011, pursuit of a drunk driver who slammed into a gas station, causing a fire. Mee received a letter dated June 7 notifying him the department intended to fire him, Shinee said.
“Although they allege that he violated the pursuit policy, the letter is unclear and vague as to how that occurred,” Shinee said.

Mee’s lawyer claims that the department is also peeved because Mee testifed for one of his colleagues at a disciplinary hearing. The gentlemen in question was accused of drunk driving, Mee testifed as an expert on DWI, and…

The commission cited Mee’s testimony in its decision to clear the discipline case, finding that there was no credible evidence that the deputy involved had been drunk.

I don’t know what to make of this. My reading of the LAT account is that the LACSO is looking to get rid of a meddlesome deputy, but I concede that account is pretty one-sided. It would be interesting to see LACSO’s side of the story, but they probably can’t discuss it.

Snark snark aborted snark.

Monday, May 7th, 2012

Prosecutors also showed a Taser allegedly used by Cpl. Jay Cicinelli in the beating of Thomas on a video screen visibly covered in blood.

You’d think that they could at least wipe off that video screen first. But this is California; they do things differently there.

I was going to make a snarky comment that this NYT article on what killed Vladimir Ilyich Lenin didn’t include my own favorite theory. Except that it does:

Dr. Lurie concurred on Friday, telling the conference that poison was in his opinion the most likely immediate cause of Lenin’s death. The most likely perpetrator? Stalin, who saw Lenin as his main obstacle to taking over the Soviet Union and wanted to get rid of him.
Communist Russia in the early 1920s, Dr. Lurie told the conference, was a place of “Mafia-like intrigue.”

Headline of the day.

Monday, May 7th, 2012

Dolphins die of heroin overdoses after zoo rave

Annals of law (part 5 of a series).

Sunday, April 29th, 2012

When does a murder take place?

In many cases, that’s an easy question to answer; the victim is DRT1 or ADASTW2.

But in some cases, you run into a situation where the victim is wounded, and dies of their injuries at a later date. The law on this varies from state to state; common law held that a death resulting from injuries inflicted during a specific act was murder if it occurred within a year and a day of the act. So if I beat someone badly, and they died 364 days later, that could be prosecuted as murder; if they died 367 days later, it could only be prosecuted as assault. According to Wikipedia, many jurisdictions in the United States have abolished the year and a day rule. California has apparently changed it to a three day and year rule.

But there’s an additional level of complexity to this, which comes up as the result of an article in today’s Statesman about the sad and awful case of Robert Middleton.

Robert Middleton was eight years old on June 28, 1998. He was going to see a friend of his when an older boy, Donald Wilburn Collins (who was 13 at the time) grabbed him, tied him to a tree, poured gasoline on him, and set him on fire. Middleton was burned over 95 percent of his body.

Middleton was treated by the Shriners at their burn institute in Galveston and went through more than 200 surgeries, including skin grafts.

Robert Middleton died a year ago today (April 29th, 2011) at the age of 20. The cause of death was squamous cell carcinoma, which is believed to have been a result of the skin grafts he received, and his death certificate shows the cause of death as “homicide” resulting from his injuries.

The Middleton family sued Donald Collins in civil court, and won a judgment against him of $150 billion dollars. Collins did not attempt to defend himself in the civil case; he is currently in prison on charges unrelated to the Middleton case. (Collins was convicted of sexual assault of an 8-year old boy when he was 16, and did time in the Texas Youth Commission for that offense. Collins has also been convicted of theft and resisting arrest, and of failure to register as a sex offender. His current sentence is for failure to comply with the requirements of the sex offender registry. Middleton also accused Collins of raping him two weeks before the gasoline attack.)

For various reasons, the Middleton case was not prosecuted at the time:

[Montgomery County Attorney David] Walker said it’s his understanding that “there were some significant difficulties because Robbie Middleton was damaged so severely and so traumatically.” Walker also said it’s his understanding that Middleton implicated “folks that it was later shown were not responsible.’ ” Colleen Middleton acknowledges that her son was in no condition to be of much help before the three-year statute of limitations ran out on possible charges stemming from what was then a nonfatal attack. There is no statute of limitations on murder.

I was reading the print edition of the HouChron daily while this was going on, and followed the case closely. One thing that is left out of discussions of the case (except for the brief allusion above), but which I clearly remember; the police actually arrested another boy before they arrested Collins. The other boy was let go within 24 hours, after a bunch of folks who knew him came forward and said “He’s a good kid; he couldn’t have done this.” (And it turned out that the other boy was also fishing in a creek several miles away at the time of the attack, with a bunch of other kids and his adult Scoutmaster.) That other boy’s name was never released, as I recall; however, Collins name was released not too long after the arrest, even though he was a juvenile.

Anyway, the gist of the legal battle is this: County Attorney Walker wants to prosecute Collins on murder charges. And specifically, he wants to date the murder as having taken place April 29, 2011, the date Middleton died. Why? That way, he can prosecute Collins as an adult for the murder. If Walker goes back to the actual date of the attack (June 28, 1998) Collins was 13 at the time; Walker’s other option is to get a court to agree that Collins should be tried as an adult now for a crime committed as a juvenile in 1998, which seems to me to be a long shot. (Though this is not unheard of; Michael Skakel is perhaps the most famous example of this, but the lawyers still seem to be wrangling over whether he should have been tried as an adult.)

The question is now in the hands of the Attorney General, Greg Abbot, and things are pretty much on hold until he issues a ruling.

Meanwhile, Collins is set to be released from prison in September of this year, barring any new developments.

1 Dead Right There.

2 Arrived Dead And Stayed That Way.

Just a random thought…

Thursday, April 5th, 2012

I have a subscription to the digital version of the NYT: partially for blog purposes, partially because I needed access to the archives for my final project in last year’s 20th Century History class. (The NYT offers a reduced rate for educational subscribers.)

When the LAT erected their paywall, I signed up at the initial 99 cent rate. I got a bill from them today at the new $3.99 a week rate. Even for blog purposes, and with no educational discount, I’m not paying $4 a week for the LAT. So I called them to cancel.

After I got to a customer service rep (note that they make it relatively hard to do so) and told her I wanted to cancel, she wanted to know why. I explained that the digital LAT isn’t worth $4/week to me.

At that point, they started playing “Let’s Make A Deal”. The initial offer was $2.99 a week. I turned that down. Then they offered me $1.99/week as their “final offer”. I agreed to that, but now I’m wondering if I could have gotten them down to 99 cents a week.

Point of this story, besides the LAT being willing to slash prices; I’d appreciate it if people would let me know if links to LAT stories don’t come up for you. The NYT, as I understand it, still has the hole in the wall that lets you read stories for free if they come from an external link, but I don’t believe the LAT offers that feature.

Also, talking about the LAT and bargain shopping gives me an excuse to use this picture, which tickles my funny bone:

Nobody beats the Los Angeles Times!