Today, I thought it might be fun to take a tour of MIT’s research reactor.
Longer bonus video: “It’s Rocket Science! with Professor Chris Bishop”. Including burning toast (does Professor Bishop have a flambe license?) and a demo of hypergolic propellants.
Techmoan is kind of a fun channel, but one that I try to avoid overusing. I’m using it today because this video popped up, and it answers a question that’s been in the back of my mind.
Whatever happened to portable televisions? Remember the Sony Watchman?
Obviously, the digital transition killed off the old analog portables. But why don’t we have portable digital televisions?
Short answer: we do, but not from any major manufacturers, and they’re pretty much crap as televisions. (Some of them may be decent portable media players, but do they do anything you can’t do with a small laptop or tablet?)
When I’m out shopping in thrift stores and other odd places, and see one of those cool looking old portable devices with a TV built in, I think about picking it up and hooking up a converter box, just for the lulz.
Bonus: “Prison Tech”. Not really the kind of thing people in prison improvise, but rather what kind of tech you’re allowed to have (and can purchase) for prison use.
It seems like it has been a while since I’ve done any computer science, so today I thought I’d focus on someone I find interesting, and who died far too young: John von Neumann.
Short: an explanation of Von Neumann architecture from Computerphile.
Long: a documentary about John von Neumann from the Mathematical Association of America.
I should probably mention that von Neumann wasn’t just an early computer scientist: he was also a brilliant mathematician and theoretical physicist, which I think comes out in this video.
First up: from the ” Megaprojects” people, “Project HARP”. Yet another thing that fascinates me, and only in part because who doesn’t like the science of big cannons?
The other reason this fascinates me, of course, is: Gerald Bull.
Next: I’m kind of borderline about including these. The hosts are just on the ragged edge of annoying me. But: fire science is science, and this was actually filmed in Del Valle, near Austin.
From “The Slow-Mo Guys”, a backdraft in 4K and slow motion.
And: “How to avoid a Backdraft”.
Finally: I know this is long-ish and very talking head, but I’ve read a couple of Paul De Kruff’s books, so this is relevant to my interests. Also: medical science is science, even if medicine is magical and magical is art.
This is an interesting intersection of two things I’m interested in: space history and photography.
“How did NASA get those great film shots of Apollo and the Shuttle?”
Bonus: I’ve touched on Harold “Doc” Edgerton previously, but this is a nice tribute and explanation of his work from MIT.
Bonus #2: “Quicker ‘n a Wink”, Doc in 1940.
I’m not going to include them here, but if you search YouTube, you can find some videos that emulate Dr. Edgerton’s photos with modern equipment.
My reason for not including them here is that they do require purchasing some equipment that you probably do not already have: while the price for the additional equipment in one video is reasonable (slightly more than $50) I don’t want to be seen as endorsing the products.
(And I realize that may seem kind of hypocritical for someone who throws around Amazon affiliate links like candy. What can I say: man’s got to have some standards, even if they are low ones.)
Today, random. First up: “RMS Titanic: Fascinating Engineering Facts”. This actually talks about both Olympic and Titanic, and (unlike a lot of Titanic stuff) concentrates more on the engineering and shipbuilding: basically, how do you build and launch something that big?
This is only science adjacent, but I wanted to post this as a tribute: James Randi appears on “I’ve Got a Secret”.
And since that was only science adjacent, James Randi’s TED talk on homeopathy, quackery and fraud. I generally hesitate to link to TED talks, but this is an exception.
More Randi: this time, talking about Uri Geller and Geller’s “repudiation” of his claims to have psychic powers.
(As a side note, when Randi died, I got to wondering what Uri Geller was up to these days. I ran across this amusing bit from Geller’s Wikipedia entry.
Have you ever wondered, “How do they build those massive freaking mirrors for really big telescopes?” I’ve read some stuff about how the mirror for the Hale Telescope was built in the 1930s and 1940s, but today?
Finally: you’ve seen the footage. But do you know the engineering reason(s) why the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapsed?
When I was a lad in school, we had to read excerpts from The Diary of Samuel Pepys. I didn’t like it much at the time. But now I’m an older person with more enjoyment of history, and I feel Pepys goes down much better when you read him as he intended to be read: in blog form.
And one thing I haven’t really addressed, even in a glancing oblique way, is the current crisis. No, the other one. No, the other other one.
Anyway, I know this is a little long, but there’s a shorter bonus video afterwards.
Bonus: from the same channel, but shorter, scientific, and even thematically appropriate for Halloween: “The Mystery of the Bog Mummies”.
My plan for today’s videos feel through because there was less science and more history in them than I really felt comfortable with for Science Sunday. So I moved those to Monday.
Instead, from MIT:
“The Sound of Gravity”, about LIGO and the search for gravity waves.
Bonus #1: “Editing Ourselves”, about CRISPER.
Bonus #2: Not by way of MIT, but a short video clip from “Cosmos”: Carl Sagan explains the 4th dimension.
The world is a smaller, colder, lesser place today.
Randi, responding to someone who compared psychic debunking to “the machine-gunning of butterflies”:
That writer never saw the distraught faces of parents whose children were caught up in some stupid cult that promises miracles. He never faced a man whose life savings had gone down the drain because a curse had to be lifted. He never held the hand of a woman at a dark seance who expected her loved one to come back to her as promised by a swindler who fed on her belief in nonsense. “Nothing is funnier…?” Tell that to the academics who lost their credibility by accepting the nonsense about telepathy that came out of the Stanford Research Institute. “The machine-gunning of butterflies?” Explain that to those whose spent their time and money trying to float in the air because a guru said they could. Are the “dangers of mass popular delusion” not “so menacing”? Mister, go dig up one of the 950 corpses of those who died in Guyana and shout in its face that Reverend Jim Jones was not dangerous.
—Flim-Flam! Psychics, ESP, Unicorns, and Other Delusions
Today: a pretty high quality documentary from Rolex, “The Trieste’s Deepest Dive”, about the 1960 descent by Jacques Piccard and Lt. Don Walsh (US Navy) to the bottom of the Challenger Deep.
This sits at a weird intersection. “The Land Beneath The Sea” is a US Navy film from 1967, but the subject it covers is the Navy’s oceanographic research programs. That puts it squarely, to me, in the “science” category. But then, I’ve been interested in oceanography ever since my parents gave me one of those “How and Why Wonder Books” on the subject a long time ago (when I was in the single-digit age range).
Bonus: here’s something that may be a little more explicitly science. “Man in Space” from 1955. This is a vintage Disney video: Uncle Walt himself shows up at about the 1:00 mark.
But: James “Connections” Burke, on “Is The Internet Redefining Knowledge?” Buttons. Pushed.
This was posted in May, but from context clues in the introduction, I think it dates back to 2001 or 2002. I set it to start about two minutes in, skipping the introductions, but you’re welcome to rewind if you wish.
Bonus: This is an episode of “New Mexico In Focus”, I think from 2014 (at least, that’s when it was posted). This one’s only about 21 minutes.
Today, I thought I’d reach back to the AT&T Tech Channel again. Let’s start with “Similiarities of Wave Behavior”, from 1959. I set this to start about 1:18 in, skipping the introduction.
And as a bonus, Dr. Walter Brattain on “Semiconductor Physics”. You may remember Dr. Brattain as one of the inventors of the transistor who shared the 1956 Nobel Prize in Physics. (The other two were John Bardeen and William Shockley.)