Archive for the ‘Cops’ Category

Random notes: September 28, 2012.

Friday, September 28th, 2012

So Bo Xilai has been expelled from the Chinese Communist Party, and faces criminal prosecution on charges related to bribery and the criminal case involving his wife and her alleged murder of a British businessman. That’s pretty much news everywhere.

But here’s something interesting:

A senior Chinese forensic scientist who works for the government has said that the evidence presented in a prominent criminal trial last month did not prove that Neil Heywood, a British businessman, was killed last year by cyanide poisoning.

More Herbert Lom obits: NYT. A/V Club. LAT.

Good news, everyone! If you work in the Texas state prisons, a Facebook friendship with a convict no longer violates the ban on fraternization!

About two weeks ago, officials reinstated the sergeant after an internal investigation determined that a number of other prison employees had the same online friend, including the prison system’s chief financial officer.

Joseph Wolfe, a former police officer with the Fullerton police department, has been charged with involuntary manslaughter and excessive use of force in the beating death of Kelly Thomas. Officer Wolfe is the third officer to be charged in this case. (Previously. Also previously, and graphic image warning.)

The findings suggest that voters are leery of sending more cash to Sacramento in the wake of a financial scandal at the parks department, spiraling costs for a multibillion-dollar high-speed rail project to connect Northern and Southern California and ill-timed legislative pay raises.

Really? That’s a shocker.

Random notes: September 27, 2012.

Thursday, September 27th, 2012

Sorry, folks. My normal schedule has been disrupted by a (thankfully not serious) personal matter.

“Who’s a good boy? Yes, you are. You’re a good boy. You sniff out drugs. Yes you do. And you don’t steal guns from the city and sell them. No, you don’t. And you don’t owe tens of thousands of dollars in child support in Texas. Good boy! Go catch the ball!”

(Hattip: Balko.)

The guy APD shot Tuesday night? Died in the hospital. (Linked article contains more details on the shooting.)

Obit watches: The WP is reporting the death of Herbert Lom.

John Silber, former Boston University president.

Andy Williams. (A/V Club. NYT. LAT.)

Holy cow.

Wednesday, September 26th, 2012

There seems to be no question that Lieu Tran had problems. Specifically, bipolar disorder.

Mr. Tran was a math teacher at a local high school. In April of 2011, he was told his contract wasn’t going to be renewed. This sent Mr. Tran into a downward spiral; he contacted a friend and told that friend he’d been having “scary thoughts about shooting his supervisors”. The friend gave him a ride to a mental hospital.

At the hospital, Tran repeated the thoughts to an admissions nurse, who testified that Tran cried, got into the fetal position and punched himself in the head during her interview with him. The nurse said she called an Austin police officer.

Mr. Tran engaged in a discussion with the APD officer later that day. He spent a week in the hospital, “having his medication adjusted and participating in group therapy”.

After he was released, he was arrested by APD and charged with “retaliation”, based on what APD considered to be his threats to “buy a firearm, tying up [Assistant Principal Sheila] Reed and [Principal Daniel] Garcia, shooting them in the arm and leg and making them watch him kill their families”.

The case went to trial this week. Today, the judge threw out Mr. Tran’s statements to the police officer:

[State District Judge Mike] Lynch ruled that because of Tran’s mental state, the statements to the officer could not be used against him at his trial, citing a Texas law that requires such statements be given voluntarily.

Without the statements, the state had no case, and the prosecution dismissed the charges.

That seems like the right thing to do. Now. But the right thing to do a year ago would have been not to bring charges.

Look, I understand Tran’s behavior might have been scary. But he sought help. He didn’t act on his impulses. He knew he had a problem and voluntarily committed himself. What were the APD and the Travis County DA thinking when they brought charges against a man who did the right thing? And did they even think about what impact this would have on other people facing similar situations?

Noted.

Wednesday, September 26th, 2012

Ewell Hunt, the former sheriff of Franklin County, Virginia, has been convicted of “misconduct by an elected official”. Mr. Hunt has been fined $500 and given a 30-day suspended jail sentence.

Former sheriff Hunt’s conviction stems from the murder of Jennifer Agee by her ex-husband, deputy Jonathan Agee. I’ve touched on this case previously here and here.

Random crap, September 26, 2012.

Wednesday, September 26th, 2012

Let us say, hypothetically, you run a restaurant. (I’m fully aware the vast majority of my readers are not crazy or stupid, but play along here.)

You need things like stoves and refrigerators to run a restaurant, right? Those things need to work. If the stove breaks, you can’t cook food. If the cooler breaks, you’re going to lose a lot of stockpiled goods. So when things break, it is important to get them fixed, fast.

What are the economics of restaurant repair? How much can you expect to pay for service? William Grimes has an interesting piece in the NYT today about that subject.

Kitchen Works offers a basic contract for Manhattan restaurants for $425 a month, which puts it on call 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. When it was open, Tavern on the Green paid $1,000 a month. Like Kitchen Repair Specialists, also a mom-and-pop operation, Kitchen Works, based in Freeport, N.Y., has about 10 trucks that cover the five boroughs and Long Island. Techs can field up to 10 calls a day.

Kitchen Works specializes, from what I can tell, in stoves. Refrigeration contracts run roughly the same.

Speaking of Grimsey, I just finished Appetite City: A Culinary History of New York. I’m trying to decide if I want to write a longer review of it, and where I want to post that if I do, but the short version: this a swell book, and I enthusiastically recommend it. (I’d also recommend purchasing the print version. There are a lot of photos and reproductions of menus in the book, and I’m not sure how well those come across in the Kindle edition.)

She paid $362 in property taxes last year for the acre she lives on. This year, McIntosh County wants $2,312, a jump of nearly 540 percent.

More:

The county also started a new garbage pickup service and added other services, which contributed to the higher tax rates, he said. Sapelo Island residents, however, still have to haul their trash to the dump.
“Our taxes went up so high, and then you don’t have nothing to show for it,” said Cornelia Walker Bailey, the island’s unofficial historian. “Where is my fire department? Where are my water resources? Where is my paved road? Where are the things our tax dollars pay for?”

Remember yesterday’s APD press conference? Remember the chief saying that APD officers should stop putting themselves in front of moving vehicles?

A police officer shot a man who drove a stolen SUV toward him following a brief pursuit in South Austin, Chief Art Acevedo said Tuesday night.

I’m not saying the officer did anything wrong, or violated policy, at this point. Details are still coming in, but it sounds like the gentleman in question (who, according to the Statesman, had 16 felony warrants) may have deliberately driven at the officer. I just think this is worth noting.

Art (Acevedo), damn it! watch. (#O of a series)

Tuesday, September 25th, 2012

So Austin’s favorite police chief had a press conference this morning “flanked by two of his harshest critics”. (In case you were wondering, those are Nelson Linder, president of the local NAACP, and Jim Harrington, executive director of the Texas Civil Rights Project.)

Why the press conference? APD policy changes, which Chief Acevedo credits to input from Mr. Linder and Mr. Harrington. Specifically:

It isn’t clear to me if these are the only policy changes, or if there were less significant ones that the Statesman is skipping. One other area that’s been highly controversial lately is photographing and recording APD officers during arrests: Scott Henson over at “Grits for Breakfast” has some good coverage of what’s been going on.

Off the top of my head, none of these sound horrible. I do have a concern that requiring a minimum of four officers to respond to emotionally disturbed persons might, just might, cause problems, if that kind of response looks overwhelming to the subject. However, I think the training requirement may offset that concern. The big issue: does APD have enough people, with the right training, to respond in a timely fashion?

Random notes: September 21, 2012.

Friday, September 21st, 2012

Somewhere, deep within the Bronx, is a horse stable. Back in the old days (some twenty years ago) people went to the stable and rented horses for rides on a trail that runs past Pelham Parkway.

The stable has been condemned by the building department, and the owners of the property haven’t paid taxes since 2007. But just because the stable is condemned doesn’t mean there’s nothing left inside.

What remains? A horse, of course. A horse named Rusty that the residents are trying to “save”.

Rusty is a mystery to even those who want nothing more than to save it. The residents and animal activists at the rally did not know its age, whether it was male or female, or how it came to be living in the stable, which has no posted name but was once known as Bronxbuster.

Noted here for family reasons: Texas Tech men’s basketball coach Billy Gillispie resigned yesterday. Gillispie had coached the team for one year.

This doesn’t sound like a firing: Gillispie states he resigned for “health reasons”. However, the university was investigating “allegations of player mistreatment” (Mike Leach, call your office, please), and Gillispie’s performance last season was disappointing, to put it mildly.

(I apologize for linking to the Statesman, but the Lubbock newspaper’s site isn’t working for me this morning. Here’s the HouChron story, which is a little longer.)

(Edited to add: Slightly different story, also from the HouChron.)

(Edited to add 2: I couldn’t pull it up at work – I kept getting errors from a proxy, and I don’t think it was ours – but now that I’m home, here’s the Lubbock paper’s coverage.)

Randy Adams had a hearing before a panel of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System yesterday. Mr. Adams is appealing the decision by the system not to include his one year as police chief of Bell in calculating his pension. (Previously.) If Mr. Adams wins his appeal, he’ll get a pension of $510,000 a year, “making him the second-highest-paid public pensioner in California” according to the LAT.

So how did the hearing go?

He was asked if he was Bell’s former police chief.
“Yes,” he replied.
Did he send an email to a Bell city official saying, “I am looking forward to seeing you and taking all of Bell’s money?!”
“On the advice of counsel I am going to exercise my right to remain silent,” he replied.
For the next 14 minutes, the man who had been a lawman for nearly 40 years, a police chief in three cities, exercised his constitutional right against self-incrimination over and over, refusing to answer most questions.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but I’m not sure I understand California law. Does the Fifth Amendment apply in an administrative proceeding? Or is Mr. Adams taking the Fifth because he’s concerned that evidence presented in the administrative proceeding could be used against him in a criminal case? (Remember, Mr. Adams has not been charged with any crimes. Yet.)

TMQ watch: September 18, 2012.

Tuesday, September 18th, 2012

The time has come for TMQ to go after…well, not exactly a gnat, maybe an amoeba…with a sledgehammer.

Actually, we were thinking of something different, but we’ll take that one and run with it after the jump…

(more…)

Hillsborough.

Thursday, September 13th, 2012

This was covered some on FARK yesterday, but I kind of feel like it is important enough to mention here.

On April 15, 1989, at the Hillsborough Stadium (located in Sheffield), 96 people were crushed to death. The initial inquiry on the deaths basically blamed the fans for what happened; that was a controversial verdict.

The British government agreed to a new inquiry in December of 2009. The results of that inquiry were issued yesterday.

Prime Minister David Cameron formally apologized on Wednesday to the victims’ families, saying their “appalling deaths” were compounded by an attempt by the police, investigators and the news media to depict the victims as hooligans and to blame them for the disaster.

More:

Quoting from the new report, Mr. Cameron said: “The Liverpool fans were not the cause of the disaster. The panel has quite simply found no evidence in support of allegations of exceptional levels of drunkenness, ticketlessness or violence among Liverpool fans, no evidence that fans had conspired to arrive late at the stadium, and no evidence that they stole from the dead and dying.”

And further:

The report also concluded that 116 witness statements presented by the police to previous inquiries had been amended by the police “to remove or alter comments unfavorable to the police,” and that police officers conducted computer checks on those who had died in an attempt “to impugn the reputations of the deceased.” In addition, the report said the coroner measured blood-alcohol levels in all who died, including children, only to discover — a fact withheld from previous inquiries — that the levels of alcohol consumption were “unremarkable and not exceptional for a social or leisure occasion.”

Additionally, the report suggests that at least some of the people who died may have lived, if they had been given prompt medical treatment:

The report said autopsy findings showed there were 41 victims who did not have the traumatic asphyxia that caused most of the deaths, and Dr. Bill Kirkup, a physician on the panel, said they might have survived if they been taken swiftly to a hospital.

Banana republicans watch: September 8, 2012.

Saturday, September 8th, 2012

Friday’s LAT had an interesting article about the tensions between LAPD beat officers and the homeless in downtown LA. Specifically, the homeless beer vendors:

One by one, his customers approached, handing over $1.50 for cans of Colt 45, Steel Reserve or Heineken that he kept hidden in a blue cooler beneath a shopping cart. Government checks had arrived a few days before. Business on skid row was good — as it has been all year.

Yeah, yeah, illegal, yeah, yeah, alcohol drives crime on skid row, yeah yeah. But I have to admit that my first reaction was “Damn, I wish Austin’s homeless were that entrepreneurial.” Seriously, it’d be kind of nice to be able to walk down the street and pick up a cold bottle of something to sip on for $2.50 or so. (This being Austin, you couldn’t get away with selling that Colt 45 or Steel Reserve crap on the streets. You’d have to go with the local craft brews; Shiner Bock in bottles, maybe some Fat Tire. Leave the malt liquor to the gas stations.)

Come to think of it, you don’t even have to limit yourself to beer, and all the problems associated with that. There are times when, if that guy on the street corner wasn’t panhandling for cash, but had a cooler full of ice and cold sodas and bottled water, damn sure I’d give him at least $2 bucks for a cold drink when it is 103 degrees out there. I know someone who tried this experiment a while back, but I’ll let him report in comments if he wishes.

(And before you jump on my case: I know the problem is more complex than I’m making it sound, and selling bottled water and sodas on street corners isn’t a surefire way to get folks from homelessness to prosperity. But providing a useful good and/or service to a willing customer beats begging for bucks in my mind.)

Banana republicans watch: September 7, 2012.

Friday, September 7th, 2012

Hey, remember Maywood? The city that couldn’t get insurance, and had to disband the police department and much of the municipal government, in large part because the cops were out of control? That Maywood?

Well, cops are going to be cops, right? And if they aren’t cops in Maywood, they’ve got to end up somewhere, right?

Guess where they ended up.

If you said “I bet they ended up with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department”, you get to drink from the firehose.

Should being employed by Maywood be a bar to signing on with LACSD? Given the level of misconduct and corruption in that department, I think a case can be made that yes, former Maywood officers should not be employed in law enforcement anywhere. But let us set aside the generalities for the moment and focus on specifics. Some of the former Maywood officers hired by LACSD included:

There were apparently four “questionable” applicants from Maywood hired (the article does not mention why number four was considered questionable) out of an unknown number of applicants from Maywood. As a reminder:

At least a third of the then-37 member force had left other police jobs under a cloud or had brushes with the law while working for Maywood.

Random notes, September 3, 2012.

Monday, September 3rd, 2012

Workers of the world, unite! Dyslexics of the world, untie!

In 2009, the two-year-old Southern lifestyle magazine [Garden and Gun -DB ] lost financial support from its first publisher. Its employees, many of whom had relocated from New York City to work here, were left with dwindling buyout packages and the promise of freelance pay. Real estate developers could no longer afford to buy advertisements, and some new prospects said they would not give a cent to the magazine until the owners took “gun” out of its title.

Oh, yes. Garden and Gun. I remember them. I was considering subscribing: that is, until they refused ads from the NRA. Now they can die in a fire, as far as I am concerned.

In other news, the NYT wants you to know that you should be careful buying art online.

My big question for the day: now that Reverend Moon is dead, how long will the Washington Times be around? I’ve gotten the distinct impression that it has survived that long purely because he wanted it that way, and his successors are not as wild about the paper as he was.

Mike Nesbitt has resigned as offensive coordinator at the University of Houston. That would be two days after the season opener, which they lost 30-13 to Texas State.

I’ve been kind of tied up the past couple of days and haven’t had a chance to blog the Austin Police Department acting as agent provocateurs to Occupy Austin story. I don’t really know what to make of it, so instead I’ll refer you to the Statesman story above, and the coverage from Grits for Breakfast here. (The other problem I have with this story is that much of the coverage comes from sources I don’t read and don’t trust.)

Speaking of Grits, he also has an interesting followup on the Texas Highway Patrol Association and other similar scam organizations.

Bad boys, bad boys…

Friday, August 31st, 2012

Our first story is kind of strange.

Matthew Itkowitz was drinking tequila one fine night in March of 2008. Apparently, Mr. Itkowitz got into an argument with his wife; Mrs. Itkowitz ran up to several people, including a man named Ryan Gonzalez, who were standing nearby, and asked for help.

Mr. Itkowitz claims that Mr. Gonzalez brandished a handgun, threatened to kill him, then punched Mr. Itkowitz and knocked him to the ground. Mr. Itkowitz deployed his own weapon and shot Mr. Gonzalez five times, killing him.

…the Los Angeles district attorney’s office declined to prosecute Itkowitz in 2010, despite concluding that his account of the shooting was “patently inconsistent” with video footage captured by a wall-mounted security camera in the alley.

Mr. Itkowitz has now been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of “deprivation of rights under color of law, using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence and obstruction of justice”.

The video footage in question appears to show Mr. Itkowitz pulling his gun and hiding it behind his right leg as Mr. Gonzalez walks away from him.

Still walking toward the tattoo parlor, Gonzalez turns back toward Itkowitz and motions for him to leave. When he doesn’t, Gonzalez turns and walks several steps back in Itkowitz’s direction. He is about 10 to 12 feet away when Itkowitz raises his gun and fires.

By the way, Mr. Itkowitz is a deputy US marshal.

Meanwhile, the LAPD is investigating five of their officers after a woman died in their custody.

And Lance White had his 2009 conviction for weapons possession overturned by a federal appeals court in Manhattan. Why?

…should have been able to tell the jury that the main witness against him, a New York City police detective, had been found to have testified untruthfully in proceedings involving an unrelated gun case.

Noted:

…the panel’s decision made it “far more likely that future juries will hear that an officer has previously lied or somehow been found untruthful. And it will make prosecutors think twice before they use him in future cases.”

21-50 to headquarters!

Wednesday, August 29th, 2012

Have you ever heard of the Texas Highway Patrol Association?

Did you know they had a museum in San Antonio? I did not. I might have gone down to see the museum, had I known it was there. But in retrospect, I’m kind of glad I didn’t make the trip: here are some photos of the museum from the Texas DPS website.

As you might have guessed from that link and the associated commentary (which I personally think is very unusual for Texas DPS), the THPA was one of those charities that does telemarketing calls, collects your money, and does very little to benefit anyone but the company that makes the calls.

In particular, the organization apparently promised to pay a $10,000 “death benefit” to families of troopers killed in the line of duty. The organization never paid, the families sued, and…

As part of a 39-page agreement, property belonging to the Texas Highway Patrol Association in Austin and a museum it operates in San Antonio will be liquidated…

Interestingly, the museum was founded by a former state legislator from Waco, Lane Denton. (Waco is also the home of the Texas Rangers Museum, which is actually well worth the drive from Austin to visit.)

In 1995, Denton was found guilty of theft and misapplying money belonging to a different organization, the Texas Department of Public Safety Officers Association, and sentenced to six years of probation.

And:

The lawsuit said state investigators found that few survivors received any financial assistance and that money from a scholarship fund went to children of board members. The suit also said officials used up to $10,000 in donations a day to buy tickets to amusement parks and movie theaters and to pay for airfare across the United States.

(Subject line hattip. I loved that show when I was a kid. No, I’m not that old: one of the local UHF stations showed syndicated reruns.)

Edited to add: In case you were wondering, here’s a Google Maps street view of the THPA headquarters. Note that this isn’t the large building on North Lamar, across from Texas DPS and right next to Dan’s Hamburgers, but another building.

Into the looking glass again.

Tuesday, August 28th, 2012

There’s a strange and noteworthy story in today’s LAT. Brian C. Mulligan is a high-ranking executive with Deutsche Bank (“a managing director and vice chairman”). Mr. Mulligan is also pursuing a $50 million damage claim against the city of Los Angeles.

According to Mr. Mulligan, he went to purchase “medical marijuana products” at a local dispensary on the night of May 15th. (Mr. Mulligan says they “help him sleep”. I was unaware that insomnia was a condition that you could prescribe marijuana for, but in retrospect I shouldn’t be surprised.)

Mr. Mulligan goes on to claim that law enforcement officers detained him, “walked him to a run-down apartment complex and told him to go to the fourth floor”. According to Mr. Mulligan, he panicked and fled from the police in the direction of Occidental College, which was nearby.

According to the LAPD, two officers responded to a report of a strange man trying to break into cars at a local Jack in the Box. While responding to that report, a second similar report came in. The two officers found Mr. Mulligan near Occidental. Their report says he matched the description of the man trying to break into the cars, he was “drenched in sweat and walked with an ‘unsteady gait'”, but he passed field sobriety tests.

The LAPD report goes on to state that Mr. Mulligan told the responding officers he had used both marijuana and “white lightning”, which the LAT claims is another name for “bath salts”. “He said he hadn’t slept in four days, was going through a divorce and felt depressed, the report said. Mulligan also said he was being chased, according to the report, which nonetheless described him as calm, lucid and cooperative.” Mr. Mulligan denies telling the LAPD officers any of this.

The officers drove Mulligan to his Toyota Prius, which they searched; Mulligan’s attorney said he had not given them permission.

Search incident to arrest?

They found his Irish passport and enough cash that they called in a supervisor, said the report, which did not specify an amount.

That seems odd. If I find enough cash to get a supervisor involved, I’m darn sure noting the exact amount (and counting at least twice) on my report.

Mulligan’s claim pegged the cash at about $5,000, a sum he said he normally carried for business travel. Then police took Mulligan — whose cellphone and passport remained in his car, his attorneys said — to the nearby Highland Park Motel, a low-rent building across from homes with barred windows.

That also seems odd. If they felt he couldn’t drive or otherwise take care of himself, shouldn’t they have taken him into formal supervised custody? Doesn’t dropping him at a “low-rent” motel set you up for exactly this kind of problem?

(The LAPD report claims Mulligan asked to be dropped off there. Mulligan denies this, and says “he was taken there against his will and told ‘he could not leave, under threat of death.'”)

At the front desk, Flanagan said, the officers took away Mulligan’s car keys and forced him to pay the roughly $40 room bill. They also gave him back the cash they’d found in his car, said another Mulligan attorney, Valerie Wass.

Since everyone seems to agree that Mulligan was dropped at the motel, I’m not exactly shocked they made him pay the bill up front. I’m not saying dropping him there was a good idea in the first place, but if they did drop him there, someone’s got to pay for the room…

…one officer escorted Mulligan to Room 208, which he said did not have a telephone. He eventually cajoled a clerk into returning his keys, his attorney said, and ran away from the motel. This week, a motel employee said he could not recall the incident.

I kind of think I’d remember something like this, if I were a clerk. Then again, I wonder if anyone actually talked to the clerk who worked that night (the LAT doesn’t specify that), or if that clerk is even still working at the motel.

In any case, the same two officers encountered Mr. Mulligan later on that night (actually, around 1 AM the following morning). Mr. Mulligan was allegedly “trying to open the passenger-side door of an occupied silver van”. The van drove off, the officers told Mr. Mulligan to get off the sidewalk, Mr. Mulligan cursed at them, and apparently ran off. (That’s the LAPD’s account: Mr. Mulligan’s lawyers apparently dispute that he was trying to open the van door, or that he cursed at the police.)

The officers soon gave chase, the report said. “At that point,” Mulligan’s claim said, “he was in such great fear that he believed the LAPD officers were not truly LAPD officers but may be impostors bent on robbing or killing.”

So he didn’t recognize these officers as the same ones who took him to the motel earlier? Or he did, but he thought the ones who took him to the motel were imposters? Do you often go to “low-rent” motels with people posing as police officers? What was the point of checking him in and making him pay the bill if they were imposters planning on “robbing and killing” him?

Anyway, the LAPD chased Mulligan down. They claim he went into a fighting stance and charged the officers, who took him down and arrested him. Mulligan’s attorney, of course, denies that his client charged the officers. And:

No charges have been filed against Mulligan, though a spokesman for the city attorney’s office, which handles misdemeanor crimes, said the incident was under review.

I’m not sure what to make of this, as I have a lot of trouble believing that either side is telling the whole truth about what went on that night. There doesn’t seem to be any dispute about the whole “checked him into the ‘low-rent’ motel” part of the story, though, and that strikes me as being a big deviation from what I’d expect to be proper procedure. Was the LAPD trying to cut a rich white guy a break? Or…?